Table 3.
Model 3.1: Local Isolation | Model 3.2: LQ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
All Cause | Breast Ca. Specific | All Cause | Breast Ca. Specific | |
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
| ||||
White Patients (n = 7164) | ||||
| ||||
Black Segregation | 0.99 (0.97,1.02) | 0.98 (0.95,1.01) | 0.86 (0.59,1.24) | 0.69 (0.39,1.20) |
Hispanic Segregation | 1.04‡ (1.00,1.08) | 1.04 (0.98,1.09) | 1.43‡ (0.96,2.14) | 1.47 (0.84,2.57) |
| ||||
Black Patients (n = 940) | ||||
| ||||
Black Segregation | 0.91 (0.85,0.98) | 0.91 (0.83,1.00) | 0.37 (0.14,0.92) | 0.35 (0.11,1.11) |
Hispanic Segregation | 0.98 (0.86,1.11) | 0.91 (0.78,1.07) | 0.88 (0.21,3.80) | 0.49 (0.08,3.07) |
| ||||
Hispanic Patients (n = 252) | ||||
| ||||
Black Segregation | 1.12 (0.92,1.35) | 1.16 (0.93,1.44) | 3.52 (0.24,52.0) | 3.70 (0.21,66.4) |
Hispanic Segregation | 1.02 (0.83,1.25) | 1.04 (0.83,1.30) | 1.08 (0.16,7.43) | 1.20 (0.15,9.58) |
indicates p < 0.10.
Note: segregation hazard ratio magnitude cannot be directly compared across isolation and LQ models, due to differences in unit definition.