Table 2.
Genetic QT score vs. treatment (white subjects) | r [95% CI] | P | N | r2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Genetic score vs. Baseline QTc | 0.52 [0.05 to 0.80] | 0.03 | 17 | 0.27 |
Genetic score vs. Dofetilide QTc slope | 0.55 [0.09 to 0.81] | 0.02 | 17 | 0.30 |
Genetic score vs. Quinidine QTc slope | 0.48 [−0.03 to 0.79] | 0.06 | 16 | 0.23 |
Genetic score vs. Ranolazine QTc slope | 0.52 [0.05 to 0.80] | 0.03 | 17 | 0.27 |
|
||||
Genetic QT score vs. treatment (black or African American subjects) | r [95% CI] | P | N | r2 |
| ||||
Genetic score vs. Baseline QTc | 0.97 [0.11 to 1.00] | 0.03 | 4 | 0.94 |
Genetic score vs. Dofetilide QTc slope | 0.97 [0.12 to 1.00] | 0.03 | 4 | 0.94 |
Genetic score vs. Quinidine QTc slope | 0.18 [−0.94 to 0.97] | 0.82 | 4 | 0.03 |
Genetic score vs. Ranolazine QTc slope | 0.55 [−0.87 to 0.99] | 0.45 | 4 | 0.30 |
Fig I in the Data Supplement shows the corresponding correlation plots.