Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;8(2):433–444. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0257-4

Table 2.

Baseline HOMA2-%B, HOMA2-%S, HOMA2-IR, and McA in the study subjects

Parameters HTG group
(n = 118)
NTG group
(n = 73)
Control group
(n = 79)
P for trend
HOMA2-%B 93.47 ± 26.28a,b 68.47 ± 21.29 79.92 ± 23.15 <0.001
HOMA2-%S 48.40 (39.70, 68.70)a,b 110.20 (62.55, 141.95) 101.20 (79.90, 140.10) <0.001
HOMA2-IR 2.09 (1.46, 2.52)a,b 0.92 (0.70, 1.61) 0.99 (0.71, 1.25) <0.001
McA 5.05 ± 0.76a,b 7.99 ± 1.79 8.34 ± 1.55 <0.001

HTG group impaired glucose tolerance patients with hypertriglyceridemia, NTG group impaired glucose tolerance patients without hypertriglyceridemia; control group, control subjects; HOMA2-%B homeostasis model assessment index 2 for β-cell function, HOMA2-%S, homeostasis model assessment index 2 for insulin sensitivity, HOMA2-IR homeostasis model assessment index 2 for insulin resistance, McA McAuley index

a P < 0.017 (0.05 divided by the number of comparisons), significantly different compared with control group

b P < 0.017 (0.05 divided by the number of comparisons), significantly different compared with the NTG group