Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00131

Table 1.

Table shows baseline and procedural (italics) parameters.

Baseline/procedural parameters Pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) IRF Cryoballoon (CB) p Value
Patients (n) 23 14 5
Sex male/female 13/10 11/3 4/1 0.41
Mean age 68 ± 8 65 ± 7 63 ± 17 0.53
Atrial fibrillation (AF) type paroxysmal/chronic (n) 21/2 8/6 2/3 0.01
Coronary artery disease (n) 5 3 0 0.73
Hypertension (n) 13 11 3 0.38
Left ventricular hypertrophy (n) 7 2 4 0.02
Diabetes (n) 4 1 0 0.81
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 58 ± 6 56 ± 7 60 ± 5 0.72
Mean left atrial diameter (mm) 44 ± 6 44 ± 12 39 ± 4 0.25
Type of oral anticoagulation (Coumadin/Dabigatran) 16/7 12/2 5/0 0.36
Ablations performed at University Hospital Regensburg 23 3 0
Ablations performed at Heart Center Bad Krozingen 0 5 0 <0.0001
Ablations performed at Heart Center Bad Neustadt 0 6 5
Bilateral insonation (yes/no) of middle cerebral artery 17/6 14/0 5/1 0.08
Total procedure time (min) 174 ± 77 153 ± 48 169 ± 12 0.74
Fluoroscopy time (min) 38 ± 21 26 ± 9 20 ± 7 0.36
Energy applications (n) 24 ± 10 52 ± 38 9 ± 2 0.001
Power (W) 36 ± 4
Temperature (°C) 43 ± 4

Homogeneity between groups was investigated using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. There was a significant difference regarding AF type, left ventricular hypertrophy, employed ablation technique/center, and number of energy applications.