Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00131

Table 2.

Total microembolic signal (MES) burden, MES differentiation, and thromboembolic shower (TES) burden are represented as median and mean values.

Pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) IRF Cryoballoon (CB) PVAC vs. IRF PVAC vs. CB IRF vs. CB
Pts. (n) 23 14 5
MES total median/mean ± SD 602/1,685 ± 2,255 2,009/2,336 ± 1,654 545/593 ± 231 p = 0.08 p = 0.81 p = 0.007
MES solid median/mean ± SD 147/330 ± 593 293/628 ± 770 82/135 ± 137 p = 0.08 p = 0.45 p = 0.13
MES gaseous median/mean ± SD 208/360 ± 511 187/327 ± 386 119/106 ± 67 p = 0.84 p = 0.13 p = 0.20
MES equivocal median/mean ± SD 74/994 ± 1,448 1,439/1,380 ± 799 345/351 ± 213 p = 0.12 p = 0.71 p = 0.01
Pts. with TES (n) 10 2 0
TES median/mean ± SD 0/1.5 ± 2 0/0.4 ± 1.3 0/0 p = 0.04 p = 0.08 p = 0.61

P values are based on the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for pairwise comparison between the ablation groups. P values are calculated by pairwise comparison between the ablation groups.

Pts., patients.