Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;7:45980. doi: 10.1038/srep45980

Table 1. Densitometry and LC/MS/MS proteomics analysis results of purified chicken histones.

Bandsa Identified proteinsb Number of unique peptidesb UniProt IDb % of total histone sample (±SD)c Coverage (%)b
Band 1 Histone H1.11L 41 P08287 3.7 ± 0.6 49
Histone H1.01 32 P08284 47
Histone H1.03 36 P08285 44
Band 2 Histone H1.11R 26 P08288 6 ± 1 51
Histone H1.01 25 P08284 46
Histone H1.11L 23 P08287 43
Band 3 Histone H5 25 P02259 18 ± 1 50
Band 4 Histone H3.2 19 P84229 24 ± 1 62
Band 5 Histone H2B 1/2/3/4/6Histone H2B 8Histone H2B 7 27 P0C1H3 19 ± 1 75
26 Q9PSW9 75
25 P0C1H5 69
Band 6 Histone H2A (III, IV) 18 P35062, P02263 15 ± 1 72
Histone H2A.V 6 P02272 54
Histone H2A (fragment) 3 F1P5G5 16
Band 7 Histone H4 29 P62801 14.6 ± 0.4 73

aBands are depicted in Fig 1. bData obtained from Scaffold, Proteome Software Inc. cResults obtained from densitometry analysis using ImageJ densitometry software version 1.6; SD, standard deviation.