Table 2. Summary of the metrics used to evaluate the different modalities and TMs acquisitions.
| MCTS | MDS | CS | NS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1P | SNR | ++ | + | ++ | ++ |
| CI | . | . | − | −− | |
| FOV | . | . | − | − | |
| PB | + | + | + | + | |
| PSFz | . | . | . | . | |
| B1P cls | SNR | ++ | + | + | + |
| CI | + | + | . | . | |
| FOV | . | . | . | + | |
| PB | + | + | + | + | |
| PSFz | . (*) | . (*) | . (*) | . (*) | |
| B2P | SNR | −− | −− | − | − |
| CI | ++ | ++ | . | . | |
| FOV | . | + | + | + | |
| PB | − | − | − | − | |
| PSFz | + | + | + | + |
++Very good, +Good, Fair, − Poor, −− Very poor. (*) The behaviour of the digital filtering is not uniform in the whole volume introducing a big variability in the expected value.