Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;10(2):269–275. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw124

Table 2.

Responses to questions depicted by centre prevalence and primary role provider

Question Response category Centre prevalence
Primary role provider
Low (n = 9) (%) High (n = 11) (%) Nurse (n = 40) (%) Medical + Managerial (n = 8) (%)
Q1 Belief in the practice of unit home HD policy Great extent + very great extent 44.4 81.8 80 62.5
Q2 Presentation of dialysis information—clear and uniform Not at all + to a slight extent 44.4 18.2 20 37.5
Q3 Well supported and advised on patient RRT decisions Great extent + very great extent 66.6 63.7 62.5 75
Q4 Preconceptions about patients’ coping with home HD Not at all + to a slight extent 55.5 18.2 35 75
Q5 Difficulty identifying patients for home HD Not at all + to a slight extent 66.6 72.8 70 87.5
Q6 Staff knowledge and bias—an important factor? Great extent + very great extent 55.5 36.4 40 62.5
Q7 Patients’ choice above all else? Great extent + very great extent 44.4 54.6 65 62.5
Q8 Patient persuasion to choose modality with best outcomes Not at all + to a slight extent + moderate extent 55.5 36.4 50 12.5
Q9 Positive patient experience during transition into dialysis Not at all + to a slight extent 66.7 54.6 7.5 0
Q10 Time and continuity of care for to empower self-care in patients Great extent + very great extent 88.9 54.6 57.5 57.5
Q11 Any concern about patient expressing home HD interest? Great extent + very great extent 22.2 27.3 17.5 0
Q12 Urgent start hospital HD conversion to home HD Great extent + very great extent 44.4 53.8 46.1 75
Q13 Hospital HD patients informed of home HD? Not at all + to a slight extent + moderate extent 100 91 70 75
Q14 Inadequate clinical input in the pre-dialysis stage Moderate extent + great extent + very great extent 66.6 54.6 45 62.5
Q15 Good set-up for training patients in home HD Great extent + very great extent 33.3 72.8 67.5 85.7
Q16 Influence of junior doctor training for home HD future Great extent + very great extent 55.5 45.5 52.5 62.5
Q17 Patients’ caregiver provided support? Not at all + to a slight extent 22.2 45.5 22.5 37.5
Q18 Adequate access to respite care? Not at all + to a slight extent 33.3 63.7 40 37.5
Q19 Home visits in good measure? Great extent + very great extent 44.4 45.5 56.4 50
Q20 Communication of your ideas for service improvement Not at all + to a slight extent 22.2 18.2 50 75

Statistical tests using Fisher’s exact test was performed to determine the significance of the difference in proportions.

None of the differences reported is statistically significant, due to small numbers of respondents.

A 55% or greater difference in proportion would be statistically significant. RRT, renal replacement therapy.