Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;9(4):855–868. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx052

Fig. 6.—

Fig. 6.—

Analysis of expression of edited genes in S. macrospora and P. confluens. Boxplots showing the distribution of expression ratios of edited genes (outliers left out for better visibility) with the median value as a horizontal line in the box between the first and third quartiles. (A) Sordaria macrospora genes with any type of putative editing site (any), genes with A-to-I editing only in wild type protoperithecia (proto), and genes with A-to-I editing only in wild type protoperithecia with editing in at least 10% of observed transcripts and where editing leads to an amino acid change (aa) were analyzed for expression in three different conditions based on published RNA-seq data (Teichert et al. 2012). The conditions analyzed are expression ratios of vegetative vs. sexual mycelium (veg/sex), wild type protoperithecia vs. sexual mycelium (wt proto/sex), and pro1 protoperithecia vs. sexual mycelium (pro1 proto/sex). (B) Pyronema confluens genes with any type of putative editing site (any), genes with A-to-I editing only in sexual mycelium (sex), and genes with A-to-I editing only in sexual mycelium with editing in at least 10% of observed transcripts and where editing leads to an amino acid change (aa) were analyzed for expression in three different conditions based on published RNA-seq data (Traeger et al. 2013). The conditions analyzed are expression ratios of sexual mycelium vs. vegetative mycelium grown in darkness (sex/DD), sexual mycelium vs. vegetative mycelium from several growth conditions (sex/vegmix), and a comparison of the two different growth conditions yielding only vegetative mycelium (DD/vegmix).