Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):777–789. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx041

Table 3.

Conserved MicroProtein Candidates

Species miP candidates
Excl. in metazoaa
Excl. in all metazoa
Excl. in plantsa
Excl. in all plants
In all species
Total PRT %b
Total %c PPId %b PRT GRP PRT GRP PRT GRP PRT GRP PRT GRP
Arabidopsis thaliana 1589 5 751 47 461 151 105 30 22 7 588 37
Solanum lycopersicon 4160 12 1399 34 1554 641 108 31 24 7 1686 41
Solanum tuberosum 6215 12 1784 29 1874 902 116 32 21 7 2011 32
Sorghum bicolor 1990 4 733 37 444 165 87 30 17 7 548 28
Oryza sativa 3447 7 945 27 678 299 103 30 29 7 810 23
Zea mays 10591 13 3315 31 2055 955 119 33 33 7 2207 21
Homo sapiens 2841 6 1107 39 530 161 14 3 15 7 559 20
Mus musculus 1209 4 681 56 358 132 8 4 16 7 382 32
Danio rerio 907 3 576 64 203 81 5 3 14 7 222 24
Drosophila melanogaster 567 2 235 41 73 24 8 3 22 7 103 18
Caenorhapditis elegans 1324 4 416 31 58 41 6 3 11 7 75 6
total 34840 11942 1222 439 41 16 7066 3113 638 186 224 77 9191
a

Exclusively in the specified group but not conserved among all.

b

Percentage of total microProtein candidate sequences (column “Total”).

c

Percentage of filtered sequences (table 2, column “Filtered”).

d

Sequences with annotated protein–protein interaction domain.

PRT, number of protein sequences; GRP, number of miP candidate families (groups).