Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):536–557. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx021

Fig. 1.—

Fig. 1.—

Comparison of the gene complements of P. megakarya and P. palmivora. (A) The ratio between gene model numbers of selected P. megakarya and P. palmivora gene families. (HK housekeeping gene; # gene families with a single-copy gene model in P. megakarya; * gene families related to plant-infection). (B) Presence of CEGs within different Phytophthora spp. based on the CEGMA output report (Parra et al. 2007). (C) Evolutionary relationship between eight randomly selected gene models where there is only a single copy in P. megakarya but there are two homeologous copies in P. palmivora. Amino acid sequence similarities were inferred using guide trees generated by WebPRANK (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/goldman-srv/webprank/, last accessed 16 February 2017). Branch length represents the number of amino acid substitutions per site. (S.dic, Saprolegnia diclina; P.meg, P. megakarya; P.pal, P. palmivora; P.par, P. parasitica; P.vit, Plasmopara viticola; P.soj, P. sojae; T.ree, Trichoderma reesei; P.inf, P. infestans; R.sol, Ralstonia solanacearum; P.hal, Plasmopara halstedii). (D) PCR amplification of SCE with two P. palmivora homeolog-specific PCR primer sets across 12 P. palmivora and 2 P. megakarya isolates (Ali et al. 2016).