Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 30;9(2):398–414. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx005

Table 4.

Comparison of Average Completeness of Recovered Coding Regions Obtained Using Different Assemblers

Species Average Completeness (%)
BWA (Default) BWA (b = 2) NGM STAMPY STAMPY (Div. = 0.1) BT2
Anole (control) 94.1 94.8 91.9 89.8 74.1
Leopard lizard 84.9 88.2 89.5 91.1 37.4
Chameleon 63.4 72.8 81.5 85.7 42.0
Monitor 70.3 77.7 83.9 88.8 38.2
Glossy snake 54.7 64.4 74.3 86.5 28.3
Scarlet snake 59.2 67.8 75.2 87.1 32.0
King snake 54.6 64.8 73.4 86.7 32.0
Corn snake 53.9 62.6 72.3 85.5 26.5
Leaf-nosed sn. 60.3 67.6 77.0 87.3 21.8
Long-nosed sn. 53.2 61.5 73.0 86.4 31.1
Night snake 54.4 64.2 72.8 86.4 27.5
Garter snake 53.8 63.8 73.2 85.9 31.0
Plated lizard 65.7 75.2 81.8 86.7 37.2
Tokay gecko 59.2 69.4 79.6 85.4 85.3 47.6
Giant day gecko 60.0 69.1 78.2 84.5 84.2 43.9
Reef gecko 55.4 65.6 77.3 84.3 84.0 42.3
AVERAGE 62.3 70.6 78.4 86.8 84.5 37.1

Note.––All assembly was done to the Anolis reference. Abbreviations—Div., divergence parameter; BT2, Bowtie 2.