Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 30;34(4):348–355. doi: 10.1002/da.22602

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and regression statistics of week 2 diagnoses to predict week 9 traumatic stress diagnoses

Regression Statistics
Week 2 Predictor Week 9 Outcome χ2 P Odds Ratio Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value Sensitivity Specificity Percentage Correctly Identified
DSM‐5
ASD PTSD 28.95 <.0001 26.91 0.48 0.97 0.70 0.92 89.9
4+ symptoms PTSD 28.95 <.0001 15.79 0.30 0.97 0.80 0.80 79.8
“Two‐week PTSD”a PTSD 36.55 <.0001 22.64 0.41 0.97 0.75 0.88 87.0
Preschool PTSD Preschool PTSD 39.08 <.0001 26.08 0.39 0.98 0.80 0.87 86.1
DSM‐IV
ASD (DSM‐IV) PTSD (DSM‐IV) 34.58 <.0001 24.21 0.37 0.98 0.78 0.87 86.5
Either algorithm
ASD PTSD 35.59 <.0001 21.52 0.39 0.97 0.75 0.88 86.5

Note. Sensitivity = Likelihood that someone with a given diagnosis at week 9 would have met criteria for the relevant diagnosis at week 2. Specificity = Likelihood that someone without a given diagnosis at week 9 would also not have met criteria for the relevant diagnosis at week 2. Positive predictive value = Likelihood that someone with a given diagnosis at week 2 would have the relevant diagnosis at week 9. Negative predictive value = Likelihood that someone without a given diagnosis at week 2 would not have the relevant diagnosis at week 9.

a

“Two‐week PTSD” this refers to an “early PTSD” algorithm, that is, ignores the requirement that symptoms be present for at least 4 weeks.