Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0173619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173619

Table 1. Characteristics and disease-free survival rate in 284 gastric cancer patient undergoing potentially curative surgery from 2000 to 2014 at Second University of Naples.

Patients(%) Recurrences(%) 5yrDFS HR 95% CI * P
Age (years) ≤ 63 144(51) 50(35) 62.9 1 Referent 0.61
> 63 140(49) 46(33) 62.0 1.10 0.60-1-35
Gender Male 170(60) 50(29) 67.9 1 Referent 0.07
Female 114(40) 46(40) 54.0 1.43 0.96–2.14
Serum CEA Levels (ng/mL) ≤ 3.5 228(80) 64(28) 69.8 1 Referent < 0.001
> 3.5 56(20 32(62) 33.7 2.55 1.67–3.90
Performance Status 0 114(40) 36(32) 66.2 1 Referent
1 132(46) 48(36) 60.2 1.26 0.82–1.95 0.32
2 38(14) 12(32) 55.8 1.58 0.82–3.05
Tumor Site Distal 112(39) 28(25) 72.1 1 Referent
Middle Third 104(37) 44(42) 53.0 2.04 1.27–3.27 0.013
Upper Third 68(24) 24(35) 60.3 1.57 0.91–2.71
Resection Distal Gastrec. 78(27) 14(18) 78.7 1 Referent 0.001
Total Gastrec. 206(73) 82(40) 56.2 2.56 1.45–4.52
Macroscopic Type § Mass 48(17) 2(4) 95.2 1 Referent
Ulcerative 116(41) 32(28) 70.0 7.43 1.78–31.03 < 0.001
Ulcer-Infiltrat. 92(32) 44(48) 47.6 12.84 3.11–53.00
Diff.-Infiltrat. 28(10) 18(64) 34.6 20.38 4.72–87.91
Hystological Type Differentiated 170(60) 48(28) 68.9 1 Referent 0.001
Undifferent. 114(40) 48(42) 51.6 1.66 1.21–2.27
Lauren's Classification Intestinal 160(56) 44(27) 69.4 1 Referent 0.004
Diffuse 124(44) 52(42) 53.0 1.81 1.21–2.71
Tumor Depth (T) 1a 14(5) 0(0) 100.0
1b 32(11) 2(6) 92.9 1 Referent
2 58(20) 2(3) 96.2 0.50 09.71–3.59
3 56(21) 30(53) 42.5 12.08 2.88–50.59 < 0.001
4a 112(39) 56(50) 43.5 10.85 2.64–44.50
4b 12(4) 6(50) 50.0 10.35 2.08–51.33
Serosal Invasion S- 160(56) 34(21) 76.6 1 Referent < 0.001
S+ 124(44) 62(50) 43.9 2.89 1.90–4.40
Node Stage (N) 0 148(52) 22(15) 83.2 1 Referent
1 52(18) 22(42) 55.8 3.14 1.74–5.68
2 48(17) 22(46) 43.4 3.56 1.97–6.44 < 0.001
3a 22(8) 20(91) 9.1 10.86 5.86–20.13
3b 14(5) 10(71) 21.4 10.33 4,86–21.96
New Node Stage (NewN) 0 148(52) 22(15) 83.2 1 Referent
1 57(20) 15(26) 73.3 1.79 0.93–3.45 < 0.001
2 36(13) 20(55) 29.9 5.26 2.87–9.66
3 43(15) 39(91) 9.3 10.40 6.11–17.71
Node Position None 148(52) 22(15) 83.2 1 Referent
LC 29(10) 7(24) 75.9 1.71 0.73–4.01
GC 28(8) 8(28) 70.6 1.86 0.83–4.20
EP 0(0) 0(0) 0 0.00 0.00–0.00 < 0.001
LC+GC 9(4) 5(55) 44.4 5.73 2.17–15.16
LC+EP 15(6) 8(53) 25.4 4.44 1.97–9.98
GC+EP 12(5) 7(58) 22.9 6.23 2.65–14.63
LC+GC+EP 43(15) 39(91) 9.3 10.42 6.12–17.74
TNM Stage IA 40(14) 0(0) 100.0
IB 44(15) 2(4) 95.2 1 Referent
IIA 36(13) 6(17) 82.4 4.34 0.87–21.52
IIB 44(15) 14(32) 62.3 8.79 1.99–38.73 < 0.001
IIIA 50(18) 26(52) 45.5 16.00 3.79–67.44
IIIB 50(18) 34(68) 27.9 24.89 5.97–103.78
IIIC 20(7) 14(70) 18.0 31.50 7.11–139.45
New TNM Stage IA 40(14) 0(0) 100.0
IB 45(16) 1(2) 97.7 1 Referent
IIA 35(12) 7(20) 78.8 10.71 1.31–87.11
IIB 48.17 12(25) 71.2 13.53 1.75–104.08 < 0.001
IIIA 40(14) 20(50) 46.4 31.40 4.21–234.07
IIIB 55(19) 37(67) 25.7 55.05 7.54–401.73
IIIC 21(8) 19(90) 9.5 76.27 10.18–571.44
No. of Resected Nodes ≤ 27 150(53) 46(31) 66.3 1 Referent 0.31
> 27 134(47) 50(37) 57.8 1.23 0.82–1.84
PO Complications No 222(78) 68(31) 66.8 1 Referent < 0.001
Yes 62(22) 28(45) 42.5 2.40 1.51–3.73
PO Chemotherapy No 102(36) 18(18) 79.8 1 Referent 0.001
Yes 182(64) 78(43) 54.0 2.36 1.41–3.94

CEA indicates carcinoembryonic antigen (normal value ≤ 3.5 ng/mL). Performance status according to the ECOG scale; postoperative complications were defined as grade II or higher of the Clavien-Dindo classification (ref. n° 33)

* 95% confidence interval

Kaplan-Meier method

median value

§ according to Bormann's classification;

differentiated includes grading 1 and 2 tumors; undifferentiated includes grading 3 tumors and signet-ring cell cancers

LC lesser curvature nodes (nodal groups 1, 3, and 5); GC greater curvature nodes (nodal groups 2, 4sa, 4sb, 4d, 6, and greater omentum); EP extra-perigastric nodes (nodal groups 7, 8a, 9, 10, 11p, 11d, and 12a)