Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0174530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174530

Table 4. Survey of the awareness rates of the ARRIVE guidelines and GSPC.

Survey contents Total N = 266 Current students n = 118 (44.4%) Research staff n = 148 (55.6%) P value
Relevant writing and publication of animal experimental studies
Participated in writing manuscripts of animal experimental studies 143 (53.8) 45 (38.1) 98 (66.2) 0.000
Published animal experimental studies 120 (45.1) 28 (23.7) 92 (62.2) 0.000
Wrote and reported animal experimental results mainly based on
1. References of relevant published studies 218 (82.0) 95 (80.5) 123 (83.1) 0.584
2. Requirements of journal editors 97 (36.5) 48 (40.7) 49 (33.1) 0.203
3. The instruction to the authors provided by targeted journals 86 (32.3) 43 (36.4) 43 (29.1) 0.201
4. Personal preferences and choices 52 (19.5) 23 (19.5) 29 (19.6) 0.983
5. Others 10 (3.8) 6 (5.1) 4 (2.7) 0.310
Awareness of the ARRIVE guidelines and GSPC
1. Heard of the ARRIVE guidelines 25 (9.4) 7 (5.9) 18 (12.2) 0.084
2. Understood and were familiar with the ARRIVE guidelines 8 (3.0) 3 (2.5) 5 (3.4) 0.692
3. Heard of GSPC 24 (9.0) 6 (5.1) 18 (12.2) 0.045
4. Understood and were familiar with GSPC 9 (3.4) 5 (4.2) 4 (2.7) 0.492
5. Believed it was necessary to develop a checklist to report results of animal experimental studies and to standardize the report of findings 219 (82.3) 96 (81.4) 123 (83.1) 0.710