Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2017 May;27(5):169–178. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000271

Table 2.

Linear regression analyses of NMR among Northern Plains and Southwestern smokers

Variable B 95% CI for B Beta Variation in NMR accounted for by each variable a P value
a. Both Tribal Populations Combined (n=150 included in model)
CYP2A6 Genotype b 0.18 0.11 to 0.25 0.38 14.52% <0.001
Gender (male=1, female=0) −0.04 −0.14 to 0.05 −0.07 0.45% 0.37
Age (years) 0.0001 −0.003 to 0.004 0.02 0.03% 0.82
Traditional Tobacco user (yes=1, no=0) −0.01 −0.12 to 0.10 −0.02 0.03% 0.81
Body Mass Index −0.008 −0.01 to −0.001 −0.17 1.35% 0.03
CPD 0.003 −0.004 to 0.01 0.07 0.45% 0.36
Tribal population (NP=1, SW=2) −0.10 −0.20 to 0.002 −0.15 2.05% 0.06
b. Northern Plains Smokers (n=108 included in model)
CYP2A6 Genotype b 0.21 0.13 to 0.30 0.45 19.71% <0.001
Body Mass Index −0.007 −0.02 to 0.001 −0.16 2.40% 0.07
c. Southwestern Smokers (n=48 included in model)
CYP2A6 Genotype b 0.11 0.0001 to 0.22 0.29 8.12% 0.05
Body Mass Index −0.005 −0.02 to 0.005 −0.14 1.99% 0.33
a

Variation in NMR accounted for by each variable is determined by: (Part Correlation)2 x 100

b

CYP2A6 genotype was coded as 0 for individuals with no known CYP2A6 reduced activity alleles (i.e. *1A/*1A, *1A/*1B, *1B/*1B genotypes), −1 for those possessing one decrease-of-function allele (i.e. *1/*9 and *1/*12 genotypes), and −2 for those possessing one or more loss-of-function or two decrease-of-function alleles (i.e. *1/*2, *1/*4, and *9/*9 genotypes)

c

Both tribal populations combined: R2=0.222, P<0.001. R2 indicates the proportion of variance in NMR levels (22.2%) that is explained by this model.

d

NP smokers: R2=0.231, P<0.001. R2 indicates the proportion of variance in NMR levels (23.1%) that is explained by this model.

e

SW smokers: R2=0.092, P=0.11. R2 indicates the proportion of variance in NMR levels (9.2%) that is explained by this model