Table 4.

Results of Dual Process Analyses for Cigarette Use Regressed on Tobacco-related Memory Associations and Working Memory Capacity with Multiple Imputations

	Male		Female		Model Fit
	Estimate(SE)	p	Estimate(SE)	p	χ2 (df)	p for χ2	RMSEA(95% CI)	CFI
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 1 Data
Past Year Cigarette Use					192.1(108)	<0.0001	.045(.035–.055)	0.961
WAT of CIG	0.61(0.05)	<0.001	0.52(0.04)	<0.001
WMC	−0.03(0.06)	0.32	0.12(0.06)	0.02
WAT X WMC	−0.22(0.08)	0.004	0.05(0.06)	0.18
Prospective Analysis of Data from Wave 1 to Wave 2
Past Year Cigarette Use					292.6(132)1	<0.0001	.06(.047–.065)	0.920
WAT of CIG	0.04(0.06)	0.53	−0.04(0.06)	0.27
WMC	−0.005(0.07)	0.94	−0.02(0.05)	0.32
WAS X WMC	0.007(0.08)	0.93	−0.07(0.07)	0.18
Prospective Analysis of Data from Wave 1 to Wave 3
Past Year Cigarette Use					183.8(120)	0.0002	.037(.026–.047)	0.968
WAT of CIG	0.06(0.06)	0.17	−0.06(0.06)	0.16
WMC	−0.03(0.06)	0.33	−0.04(0.07)	0.26
WAT X WMC	−0.09(0.08)	0.13	−0.04(0.08)	0.33

Covariates in the models: age, acculturation and ethnicity (Hispanic yes/no) and additional control of wave 1 outcome in prospective analysis.

Standardized parameter estimates and standard errors from multiple-group approach structural equation models are presented in this table.

WAT: Word Association Test; WMC: Working Memory Capacity; CIG: Cigarette Use. p values are 1-tailed.

¹Covariance between baseline cigarette use and other predictors were not included.