Table 3.
Variablea | M(SD) | Age | Gender | Tenure | Income | Dist./proc. | Info./inter. | NA | EE | Dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 42.15 (13.55) | |||||||||
Genderb | 1.46 (0.50) | 0.021 | ||||||||
Tenurec | 8.97 (8.09) | 0.527*** | 0.021 | |||||||
Income (median) | US$ 70-79k (2.60d) | −0.133 | −0.183* | 0.043 | ||||||
Dist./proc. | 3.49 (0.84) | −0.151* | −0.155* | 0.010 | 0.230** | (0.95) | ||||
Info./inter. | 3.96 (0.90) | −0.219** | 0.007 | −0.101 | 0.126 | 0.570*** | (0.94) | |||
NA | 1.67 (0.77) | −0.115 | −0.048 | 0.012 | 0.038 | −0.213** | −0.271*** | (0.91) | ||
EE | 17.12 (7.50) | −0.113 | 0.054 | −0.043 | −0.126 | −0.348*** | −0.342*** | 0.664*** | (0.94) | |
Dev. | 2.31 (1.24) | −0.192** | −0.128 | −0.048 | 0.127 | −0.125 | −0.183* | 0.672*** | 0.533*** | (0.94) |
Dist./Proc., distributive/procedural justice composite; Info./Inter., informational/interpersonal justice composite; Dev., Deviance; NA, negative affect; EE, emotional exhaustion. Reliability estimates (α) presented in parentheses on the diagonal. Income was inadvertently assessed as household (vs. individual income as in Study 1).
N = 183.
1 = female, 2 = male.
In years.
$10,000 increments.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.