Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 6;8:479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00479

Table 4.

Unstandardized regression coefficients with confidence intervals (standard errors in parentheses) estimating emotional exhaustion and employee deviance.

Variablea Emotional exhaustion (M) Employee deviance (Y)
Coeff. 95% CI Coeff. 95% CI
Dist./proc. (X) 1.087 (0.593) 2.258, −0.083 −0.022 (0.106) −0.187, 0.230
Emotional exhaustion (M) 0.030 (0.014) 0.004, 0.057
Employee age (W) −0.044 (0.035) −0.113, 0.026 −0.010 (0.006) −0.022, 0.003
X × W 0.094 (0.041) 0.012, 0.175 −0.008 (0.007) −0.022, 0.007
Gender 1.019 (0.790) −0.541, 2.579 −0.215 (0.140) −0.492, 0.062
Income −0.206 (0.156) −0.513, 0.101 0.049 (0.028) −0.006, 0.103
Tenure −0.011 (0.057) −0.122, 0.101 0.001 (0.010) −0.019, 0.021
Negative affect 5.896 (0.531) 4.849, 6.944 0.864 (0.123) 0.621, 1.106
Constant 7.160 (1.965) 3.281, 11.039 −0.313 (0.360) −2.859, 2.045
R2 = 0.545 R2 = 0.503
F(9, 172) = 22.932, p < 0.001 F(10, 171) = 17.306, p < 0.001
Direct effects Coeff./95% CI Indirect effects Coeff./95% CI
Younger employees 0.129 (0.149) [−0.166, 0.423] 0.071 (0.045) [0.183, −0.007]
Older employees −0.085 (0.142) [−0.366, 0.195] −0.006 (0.027) [−0.045, 0.068]

Direct and indirect effects are tested at ±1 standard deviation on employee age. Significant effects are presented in bold.

Dist./Proc., distributive/procedural justice composite. Info./Inter. and Info./Inter. × age terms are included as covariates, but are not presented here to save space.

a

N = 182.