Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 6;8:479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00479

Table 5.

Unstandardized regression coefficients with confidence intervals (standard errors in parentheses) estimating emotional exhaustion and employee deviance.

Variablea Emotional exhaustion (M) Employee deviance (Y)
Coeff. 95% CI Coeff. 95% CI
Info./inter. (X) −0.641 (0.636) −1.897, 0.614 −0.026 (0.113) −0.249, 0.196
Emotional exhaustion (M) 0.030 (0.014) 0.004, 0.057
Employee age (W) −0.046 (0.035) −0.115, 0.024 −0.010 (0.006) −0.022, 0.003
X × W 0.080 (0.041) 0.160, −0.000 0.002 (0.007) −0.013, 0.016
Gender 1.019 (0.790) −0.541, 2.579 −0.215 (0.140) −0.492, 0.062
Income −0.206 (0.156) −0.513, 0.101 0.049 (0.028) −0.006, 0.103
Tenure −0.011 (0.057) −0.122, 0.101 0.001 (0.010) −0.019, 0.021
Negative affect 5.896 (0.531) 4.849, 6.944 0.864 (0.123) 0.621, 1.106
Constant 10.953 (2.898) 5.233, 16.673 0.238 (0.533) −0.814, 1.289
R2 = 0.545 R2 = 0.503
F(9, 172) = 22.932, p < 0.001 F(10, 171) = 17.306, p < 0.001
Direct effects Coeff./95% CI Indirect effects Coeff./95% CI
Younger employees −0.052 (0.182) [−0.411, 0.308] −0.014 (0.042) [−0.065, 0.100]
Older employees −0.001 (0.108) [−0.214, 0.212] 0.053 (0.028) [0.123, −0.009]

Direct and indirect effects are tested at ±1 standard deviation on employee age. Significant effects are presented in bold.

Info./Inter., informational/interpersonal justice composite. Dist./proc. and dist./proc. × age terms are included as covariates, but not presented here to save space.

a

N = 182.