Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 5;18:32. doi: 10.1186/s12863-017-0501-y

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Distribution of read-depth coverage in genotype calls for both methods of library preparation. The conventional-primer method outperformed the method with selective primers on the basis of the number of genotype calls reported. The selective-primer method produced more calls with read-depth values greater than 10, whereas the conventional-primer method produced more genotypes with 10 reads or fewer