Table 4.
Suckling piglets | Weaners | Fatteners | Adults | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk factor | Estimate | Error | p | Estimate | Error | p | Estimate | Error | P | Estimate | Error | p |
Intercept | -2.385 | 3.695 | -4.561 | 4.980 | 0.569 | 2.205 | 3.338 | 2.138 | ||||
Number of sows | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.975 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.881 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.060 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.319 |
Number of sows2* | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.042 | |||||||||
Gender - male (n = 41) | -0.877 | 0.370 | 0.018 | -0.447 | 0.370 | 0.226 | -0.178 | 0.370 | 0.631 | -0.003 | 0.370 | 0.995 |
- female (n = 18) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
Education - non-unia (n = 39) | -0.725 | 0.323 | 0.025 | -0.464 | 0.324 | 0.152 | -0.112 | 0.331 | 0.736 | -0.159 | 0.322 | 0.622 |
- uni (n = 20) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
Age | 0.392 | 0.131 | 0.003 | 0.351 | 0.146 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 0.027 | 0.439 | -0.040 | 0.026 | 0.122 |
Age2* | -0.004 | 0.001 | <0.001 | -0.004 | 0.002 | 0.013 | ||||||
Years at work | 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.310 | -0.005 | 0.028 | 0.867 | -0.016 | 0.027 | 0.562 | 0.014 | 0.027 | 0.600 |
Age at weaning | bna | 0.032 | 0.043 | 0.466 | ||||||||
Need for AMc | 0.092 | 0.126 | 0.4682 | -0.047 | 0.126 | 0.712 | 0.044 | 0.126 | 0.726 | 0.028 | 0.126 | 0.823 |
Risks of AMc | -0.196 | 0.143 | 0.1695 | -0.210 | 0.145 | 0.148 | 0.052 | 0.143 | 0.719 | -0.001 | 0.143 | 0.994 |
Benefits of AMc | -0.119 | 0.155 | 0.442 | 0.233 | 0.155 | 0.132 | 0.286 | 0.156 | 0.068 | 0.233 | 0.154 | 0.130 |
Vet’s contributionc | 0.121 | 0.135 | 0.372 | -0.003 | 0.135 | 0.984 | -0.134 | 0.152 | 0.378 | 0.141 | 0.135 | 0.297 |
Internal biosecurityd | -0.022 | 0.019 | 0.237 | 0.004 | 0.019 | 0.823 | -0.031 | 0.019 | 0.095 | -0.024 | 0.018 | 0.192 |
External biosecurityd | -0.002 | 0.021 | 0.913 | -0.033 | 0.021 | 0.115 | 0.011 | 0.020 | 0.578 | 0.001 | 0.020 | 0.957 |
* The quadratic term auni university, vet veterinarian, b na not applicable; cStatements were assessed on a 6-point Likert scale, where higher scores indicated higher agreement, combined into four constructs and expressed as the mean score per construct; dScores for internal and external biosecurity range between 0 and 100, where 100 is “perfect biosecurity”