Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 27;230(5):619–630. doi: 10.1111/joa.12586

Table 4.

Result of simple linear regression analyses among the measured parameters and age

Parameters Decision coefficient (r 2) P‐value Slope of the regression line Intercept of the regression
CBVAa 0.0058 0.3910 −0.0400 6.9720
SLSb 0.0069 0.3388 −0.0441 2.4807
McGSc 0.0095 0.2598 −0.0532 5.9153
CLd 0.1058 0.0001 0.3225 −15.9544
Kyphe 0.0457 0.0125 0.1918 34.1563
LLf 0.0093 0.2631 −0.0968 59.3261
SSg 0.0004 0.8218 −0.0148 41.3323
PTh 0.0945 0.0003 0.2085 3.0202
PIi 0.0385 0.0220 0.1936 44.3585
PThj 0.0068 0.3381 −0.0054 11.1312
SVAk 0.1368 <0.0001 0.0781 −3.0971
TPAl 0.0562 0.0055 0.1797 8.2725
APFm 0.0394 0.0206 0.1430 191.0203
KneeFlexn 0.0621 0.0034 0.1008 −5.5798
AnkleFlexo 0.0341 0.0313 0.0384 2.4860
a

The chin–brow vertical angle (CBVA).

b

The slope of the line of sight (SLS).

c

McGregor slope (McGS; Lafage et al. 2016).

d

C2–C7 lordosis (CL).

e

T1–T12 kyphosis (kyph).

f

L1–S1 lumbar lordosis (LL).

g

Sacral slope (SS).

h

Pelvic tilt (PT).

i

Pelvic incidence (PI; Duval‐Beaupère et al. 1992; Legaye et al. 1998).

j

Pelvic thickness (PTh; Le Huec et al. 2011).

k

The offset between the vertical line through the posterior edge of the base of the sacrum and the centre of the vertebral body of C7 (Roussouly et al. 2006; Schwab et al. 2013).

l

The sum of the PT and the angle between the plumb line from the hip axis (HA; Protopsaltis et al. 2014).

m

Hip joint extension determined using the angle pelvi‐femoral (APF; Mangione & Senegas, 1997).

n

The mean of the bilateral knee flexion angles.

o

The ankle dorsiflexion angle measured between the line from the notch to the midpoint of the distal tibial joint surfaces and the plumb line from the midpoint.