Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2017 Mar 28;73(Pt 4):606–609. doi: 10.1107/S2056989017004509

Crystal structure and absolute configuration of (4S,5R,6S)-4,5,6-trihy­droxy-3-methyl­cyclo­hex-2-enone (gabosine H)

Gaurao D Tibhe a, Mario A Macías b,, Enrique Pandolfi a, Valeria Schapiro a, Leopoldo Suescun c,*
PMCID: PMC5382632  PMID: 28435731

The absolute configuration of the title compound, determined as 4S,5R,6S on the basis of the synthetic pathway, was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The mol­ecule is formed by a substituted six-membered cyclo­hexene ring adopting an envelope conformation and substituted by carbonyl, methyl and hydroxyl groups. The supra­molecular structure is mainly built by a combination of O—H⋯O and weaker C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Keywords: crystal structure, absolute configuration, Mitsunobu inversion reaction, natural product

Abstract

The mol­ecule of the title keto carbasugar, C7H10O4, is formed by a cyclo­hexene skeleton with an envelope conformation, substituted by carbonyl, methyl and hydroxyl groups. The crystal structure is controlled mainly by a combination of strong O—H⋯O and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming nearly perpendicular chains running parallel to the [110] and [-110] directions. This perpendicularity is caused by a tetra­gonal pseudosymmetry influenced by the similarity between the a and b axes, the value of 90.9770 (10)° of the β angle and the action of a 21 screw axis, which transform each chain into its corresponding nearly orthogonal one.

Chemical context  

Gabosines are regarded as secondary metabolites and were first isolated in 1974 from Streptomyces strains (Tsushiya et al., 1974). These compounds are closely related to carbasugars and exhibit DNA binding properties (Tang et al., 2000). To date, 15 gabosines have been isolated, of which 14 have been synthesized. Gabosine H is one of such kind, whose total synthesis has recently been achieved by our research group (Tibhe et al., 2017), starting from a biotransformation of toluene that introduces chirality. A further sequence of reactions, including Mitsunobu and final removal of the acetyl protective group, led to the title compound.graphic file with name e-73-00606-scheme1.jpg

Structural commentary  

Fig. 1 shows the mol­ecule of the title compound. The absolute configuration of gabosine H with the carbonyl, methyl and hydroxyl groups in equatorial positions, determined as 4S,5R,6S on the basis of synthetic pathway, was confirmed by X-ray diffraction on the basis of anomalous dispersion of light atoms only. The six-membered ring (C1–C6) in the mol­ecule adopts an envelope conformation with atom C5 as the flap [deviating from the plane through the other ring atoms by 0.639 (2) Å] and puckering parameters Q = 0.4653 (19) Å, θ = 129.5 (2)° and φ = 66.7 (3)°.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the anisotropic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features  

In the crystal structure, hydrogen bonds O4—H41⋯O1i [symmetry code: (i) x − 1, y − 1, z] link the mol­ecules into chains that run along the [110] direction (Table 1). These chains are further connected by weaker C6—H6⋯O4ii and C4—H4⋯O6iii [symmetry codes: (ii) x + 1, y, z; (iii) x, y − 1, z] hydrogen bonds along the [Inline graphic10] direction, forming (001) sheets (Fig. 2). Considering that the chains run along the diagonal of the ab plane and the fact that ab, it is possible to observe that the 2 1 screw axis parallel to b transforms each chain into a nearly orthogonal one along [Inline graphic10] (Fig. 3). The orthogonal chains are connected by single C6—H6⋯O6iv, O6—H61⋯O5v and bifurcated O5—H51⋯O4vi and O5—H51⋯O5vi hydrogen bonds [symmetry codes: (iv) −x + 1, y − Inline graphic, −z + 1; (v) −x + 1, y + Inline graphic; (vi) −x, y + Inline graphic, −z + 1] to define a three-dimensional array along the [001] direction. These hydrogen bonds connect the orthogonal chains by pairs along [001]. Between these neighboring [001] sheets, weak dipolar or van der Waals forces stabilize the assembly along the c-axis direction.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O4—H41⋯O1i 0.94 (4) 1.96 (4) 2.873 (2) 163 (3)
C6—H6⋯O4ii 0.98 2.46 3.195 (2) 131
C4—H4⋯O6iii 0.98 2.36 3.345 (3) 179
C6—H6⋯O6iv 0.98 2.62 3.306 (2) 127
O6—H61⋯O5v 0.87 (4) 1.99 (4) 2.811 (2) 155 (3)
O5—H51⋯O4vi 0.85 (4) 2.45 (3) 3.050 (2) 128 (3)
O5—H51⋯O5vi 0.85 (4) 2.26 (4) 3.0402 (12) 152 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Partial crystal packing of the title compound showing the C—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dotted lines) along [110] and [Inline graphic10], forming sheets parallel to the (001) plane.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Partial crystal packing of the title compound connected into a nearly orthogonal assembly along [001] through C—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dotted lines).

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.36 with one update; Groom et al., 2016) was carried out considering mol­ecular structures similar to gabosine and its derivatives. Among the natural compounds, only the structure of gabosine N, (4R,5R,6R)-4,5,6-trihy­droxy-2-methylcyclo­hex-2-enone (Tang et al. 2000), has been reported. The remaining hits were mainly derivatives of other gabosines different from H or derivatives such as 5-hy­droxy-4-methyl-7-oxabi­cyclo­[4.1.0]hept-3-en-2-one (White et al., 2010), which is an epoxide with different configuration of the asymmetric carbons compared with gabosine H.

Synthesis and crystallization  

The synthesis of gabosine H was achieved by inversion of the allylic –OH group using Mitsunobu conditions followed by deprotection. (4R,5R,6S)-5-Acet­oxy-4,5-dihy­droxy-3-methyl­cyclo­hex-2-enone (2, Fig. 4; 0.149 mmol, 0.030 g) was dissolved in 1 ml of benzene and TPP (0.283 mmol, 0.078 g) was added along with p-nitro­benzoic acid (0.299 mmol, 0.050 g) and diisopropyl azodi­carboxyl­ate (DIAD; 0.297 mmol, 0.060 g). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The solvent was evaporated and the crude mass was used for the next reaction without further purification. The crude product was dissolved in MeOH (3.4 mL), a catalytic qu­antity of K2CO3 was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min and filtered. Evaporation of the solvent from the filtrate afforded crude gabosine H, which was purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH, 9:1 v/v) to afford pure gabosine H as a white crystalline powder (yield: 7.2 mg, 30%; m.p. 390.6 K. Suitable crystals for X-ray analysis were obtained by dissolving the solid in a minimum amount of methanol and allowing it to evaporate at room temperature. IR (KBr): 3400, 2875, 1660 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 2.07 (s, 3 H), 3.56 (dd, J = 10.8, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.01 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.92 (s, 1 H).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Reaction scheme.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. H atoms bonded to C were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å) and included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters set to 1.2–1.5 times the U eq of the parent atom. Hy­droxy H atoms were located in difference density maps and were refined with U iso(H) = 1.5 U eq(O). The absolute structure parameter y was calculated using PLATON (Spek, 2009). The resulting value of 0.07 (7) indicates that the absolute structure was determined correctly (Hooft et al., 2008).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C7H10O4
M r 158.15
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21
Temperature (K) 298
a, b, c (Å) 5.4143 (2), 5.4176 (2), 11.9200 (5)
β (°) 90.977 (1)
V3) 349.59 (2)
Z 2
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.06
Crystal size (mm) 0.37 × 0.34 × 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Venture/Photon 100 CMOS
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013)
T min, T max 0.588, 0.754
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 12187, 1492, 1472
R int 0.046
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.637
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.033, 0.088, 1.08
No. of reflections 1492
No. of parameters 111
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.25, −0.18
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 639 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter 0.09 (11)

Computer programs: SAINT (Bruker, 2013), SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209sup1.cif

e-73-00606-sup1.cif (364.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209Isup2.hkl

e-73-00606-Isup2.hkl (120.4KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1539327

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank ANII (EQC_2012_07), CSIC and the Facultad de Química for funds to purchase the diffractometer and the financial support of OPCW and PEDECIBA. GT and MM also thank ANII for their respective postdoctoral fellowships (PD_NAC_2014_1_102498 and PD_NAC_2014_1_102409).

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C7H10O4 F(000) = 168
Mr = 158.15 Dx = 1.502 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21 Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 5.4143 (2) Å Cell parameters from 9784 reflections
b = 5.4176 (2) Å θ = 3.7–78.8°
c = 11.9200 (5) Å µ = 1.06 mm1
β = 90.977 (1)° T = 298 K
V = 349.59 (2) Å3 Parallelepiped, colorless
Z = 2 0.37 × 0.34 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 Venture/Photon 100 CMOS diffractometer 1492 independent reflections
Radiation source: Cu Incoatec microsource 1472 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1 Rint = 0.046
\j and ω scans θmax = 79.1°, θmin = 3.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2013) h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.588, Tmax = 0.754 k = −6→6
12187 measured reflections l = −15→14

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: full H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0546P)2 + 0.0518P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.088 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.08 Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
1492 reflections Δρmin = −0.18 e Å3
111 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraint Extinction coefficient: 0.161 (15)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 639 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map Absolute structure parameter: 0.09 (11)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.4992 (3) 0.2954 (4) 0.22586 (16) 0.0293 (4)
C2 0.3815 (4) 0.1293 (4) 0.14457 (16) 0.0313 (5)
H2 0.4304 0.1373 0.0702 0.038*
C3 0.2068 (3) −0.0338 (3) 0.17173 (15) 0.0262 (4)
C31 0.0921 (4) −0.2029 (5) 0.08715 (17) 0.0374 (5)
H31A 0.1711 −0.1813 0.0163 0.056*
H31B −0.0807 −0.1656 0.0790 0.056*
H31C 0.1119 −0.3706 0.1116 0.056*
C4 0.1234 (3) −0.0631 (3) 0.29155 (15) 0.0249 (4)
H4 0.2190 −0.1965 0.3269 0.030*
C5 0.1658 (3) 0.1719 (4) 0.35829 (15) 0.0237 (4)
H5 0.0534 0.3005 0.3302 0.028*
C6 0.4314 (3) 0.2607 (3) 0.34819 (14) 0.0258 (4)
H6 0.5418 0.1368 0.3818 0.031*
O1 0.6472 (3) 0.4524 (3) 0.19769 (14) 0.0453 (5)
O4 −0.1316 (3) −0.1192 (3) 0.29994 (14) 0.0398 (4)
H41 −0.172 (6) −0.273 (8) 0.269 (3) 0.060*
O5 0.1120 (3) 0.1206 (3) 0.47319 (11) 0.0336 (4)
H51 0.096 (5) 0.263 (7) 0.502 (3) 0.050*
O6 0.4549 (3) 0.4821 (3) 0.40965 (13) 0.0374 (4)
H61 0.606 (7) 0.485 (7) 0.437 (3) 0.056*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0252 (8) 0.0305 (10) 0.0322 (9) −0.0046 (8) 0.0038 (7) 0.0021 (8)
C2 0.0322 (9) 0.0360 (11) 0.0257 (8) −0.0051 (8) 0.0055 (7) −0.0002 (8)
C3 0.0251 (8) 0.0263 (9) 0.0274 (8) 0.0013 (7) 0.0018 (6) −0.0011 (7)
C31 0.0429 (11) 0.0358 (11) 0.0335 (10) −0.0084 (10) 0.0007 (8) −0.0050 (9)
C4 0.0241 (8) 0.0219 (9) 0.0289 (9) 0.0001 (7) 0.0061 (6) 0.0011 (7)
C5 0.0227 (8) 0.0242 (9) 0.0243 (8) 0.0024 (6) 0.0037 (6) 0.0007 (6)
C6 0.0240 (8) 0.0267 (10) 0.0267 (8) 0.0011 (7) 0.0004 (6) −0.0019 (7)
O1 0.0464 (9) 0.0459 (10) 0.0440 (8) −0.0236 (8) 0.0080 (7) −0.0002 (7)
O4 0.0287 (8) 0.0363 (9) 0.0548 (9) −0.0099 (6) 0.0152 (6) −0.0124 (7)
O5 0.0363 (7) 0.0388 (8) 0.0260 (7) −0.0005 (6) 0.0091 (5) −0.0016 (6)
O6 0.0329 (7) 0.0364 (9) 0.0429 (8) −0.0016 (6) −0.0044 (6) −0.0125 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—O1 1.220 (3) C4—C5 1.517 (2)
C1—C2 1.461 (3) C4—H4 0.9800
C1—C6 1.521 (2) C5—O5 1.432 (2)
C2—C3 1.338 (3) C5—C6 1.523 (2)
C2—H2 0.9300 C5—H5 0.9800
C3—C31 1.490 (3) C6—O6 1.410 (2)
C3—C4 1.514 (2) C6—H6 0.9800
C31—H31A 0.9600 O4—H41 0.94 (4)
C31—H31B 0.9600 O5—H51 0.85 (4)
C31—H31C 0.9600 O6—H61 0.87 (4)
C4—O4 1.419 (2)
O1—C1—C2 121.89 (18) O4—C4—H4 108.6
O1—C1—C6 121.36 (18) C3—C4—H4 108.6
C2—C1—C6 116.75 (16) C5—C4—H4 108.6
C3—C2—C1 123.26 (17) O5—C5—C4 107.89 (15)
C3—C2—H2 118.4 O5—C5—C6 110.15 (14)
C1—C2—H2 118.4 C4—C5—C6 110.99 (14)
C2—C3—C31 122.04 (17) O5—C5—H5 109.3
C2—C3—C4 121.40 (16) C4—C5—H5 109.3
C31—C3—C4 116.52 (16) C6—C5—H5 109.3
C3—C31—H31A 109.5 O6—C6—C1 111.83 (16)
C3—C31—H31B 109.5 O6—C6—C5 107.72 (14)
H31A—C31—H31B 109.5 C1—C6—C5 110.99 (14)
C3—C31—H31C 109.5 O6—C6—H6 108.7
H31A—C31—H31C 109.5 C1—C6—H6 108.7
H31B—C31—H31C 109.5 C5—C6—H6 108.7
O4—C4—C3 113.27 (15) C4—O4—H41 113 (2)
O4—C4—C5 106.33 (14) C5—O5—H51 103 (2)
C3—C4—C5 111.22 (14) C6—O6—H61 106 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −175.5 (2) O4—C4—C5—C6 −175.86 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C3 5.4 (3) C3—C4—C5—C6 −52.12 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C31 −179.29 (19) O1—C1—C6—O6 28.4 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −1.9 (3) C2—C1—C6—O6 −152.56 (18)
C2—C3—C4—O4 145.37 (18) O1—C1—C6—C5 148.7 (2)
C31—C3—C4—O4 −37.2 (2) C2—C1—C6—C5 −32.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 25.7 (2) O5—C5—C6—O6 −62.1 (2)
C31—C3—C4—C5 −156.85 (17) C4—C5—C6—O6 178.49 (14)
O4—C4—C5—O5 63.37 (19) O5—C5—C6—C1 175.17 (16)
C3—C4—C5—O5 −172.89 (14) C4—C5—C6—C1 55.8 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O4—H41···O1i 0.94 (4) 1.96 (4) 2.873 (2) 163 (3)
C6—H6···O4ii 0.98 2.46 3.195 (2) 131
C4—H4···O6iii 0.98 2.36 3.345 (3) 179
C6—H6···O6iv 0.98 2.62 3.306 (2) 127
O6—H61···O5v 0.87 (4) 1.99 (4) 2.811 (2) 155 (3)
O5—H51···O4vi 0.85 (4) 2.45 (3) 3.050 (2) 128 (3)
O5—H51···O5vi 0.85 (4) 2.26 (4) 3.0402 (12) 152 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1, y−1, z; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) x, y−1, z; (iv) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1; (v) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1; (vi) −x, y+1/2, −z+1.

References

  1. Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Hooft, R. W. W., Straver, L. H. & Spek, A. L. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 96–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  5. Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  8. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Tang, Y. Q., Maul, C., Höfs, R., Sattler, I., Grabley, S., Feng, X. Z., Zeeck, A. & Thiericke, R. (2000). Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 149–153.
  10. Tsushiya, T., Mikami, N., Umezawa, S., Umezawa, H. & Naganawa, H. (1974). J. Antibiot. 27, 579–586. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Tibhe, G. D., Macías, M. A., Pandolfi, E., Suescun, L. & Schapiro, V. (2017). Synthesis, 49, 565–570.
  12. White, L. V., Dietinger, C. E., Pinkerton, D. M., Willis, A. C. & Banwell, M. G. (2010). Eur. J. Org. Chem., pp. 4365–4367.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209sup1.cif

e-73-00606-sup1.cif (364.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209Isup2.hkl

e-73-00606-Isup2.hkl (120.4KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989017004509/rz5209Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1539327

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES