Table 3.

Mean Differences in Outcomes and Social Cognitive Theory Constructs of Participants in the Home Sweet Home Intervention (n=47)

Outcomes	Measurement Range	Before n=47	After n=47	Average Change	P value
Social Cognitive Theory Construct: Behavior (Program Goals)
Adult Sedentary Behavior	0–5 hours/d	3.5 +/− 1.5	2.8 +/− 1.5	−0.7	0.005*
Child Sedentary Behavior	0–5 hours/d	3.2 +/− 1.5	2.4 +/− 1.4	−0.7	0.006*
Meals Eaten at Home		5.2 +/− 2.7	4.8 +/− 2.7	−0.55	0.17
Mindful Eating Scores
Disinhibition	8–40	29.9 +/− 5.9	31.7 +/− 6.0	1.9	0.001*
Awareness	7–35	25.7 +/− 4.2	27.5 +/− 4.4	2.1	0.001*
Emotion Eating	4–20	15.0 +/− 3.7	16.8 +/− 3.0	1.6	0.002*
Distractions	3–15	10.8 +/− 2.2	11.0 +/− 2.2	0.24	0.47
Adult red light food intake	Servings/d	4.4 +/− 3.9	3.1 +/− 2.6	−1.4	0.007*
Child red light food intake	Servings/d	5.3 +/− 4.4	3.3 +/− 2.1	−1.9	0.006*
Social Cognitive Theory Construct: Characteristics of the Individual
Limited use of sweet/salty snacks and sugar-sweetened beverages as rewards	2–10	6.9 +/− 1.9	7.7 +/− 1.6	0.70	0.04
Limited use of physical inactivity as a reward	3–15	10.3 +/− 1.6	10.0 +/− 2.1	−0.3	0.51
Role modeling: healthy eating	3–15	10.2 +/− 2.3	11.1 +/− 2.1	0.70	0.06
Role modeling: mindful eating	3–15	10.2 +/− 3.0	11.6 +/− 2.6	1.4	0.006*
Role modeling: physical activity	2–10	5.9 +/− 1.6	6.4 +/− 1.5	0.5	0.02
Social Cognitive Theory Construct: Characteristics of the Environment
Availability of fruits and vegetables	2–10	9.4 +/− 1.5	9.6 +/− 0.9	0.11	0.54
Limited availability sweet/salty snacks and sugar-sweetened beverages	4–20	10.4 +/− 4.0	12.3 +/− 3.6	2.13	<0.0001*
Access to fruits and vegetables	2–10	7.2 +/− 2.1	7.6 +/− 1.9	0.37	0.33
Limited access to sweet/salty snacks and sugar-sweetened beverages	4–20	12.7 +/− 4.4	14.7 +/− 4.5	1.97	0.004*

Two-tailed paired t-tests were used to determine whether the intervention produced significant changes in the four behaviors and SCT constructs.

^*Significantly improved scores or p=<0.01.