Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 23;12(4):585–590. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05650516

Table 2.

Comparison of histopathologic findings at biopsy between the patients of low birth weight–FSGS, normal birth weight–FSGS, and normal birth weight–minimal change nephrotic syndrome

Variables All LBW-FSGS NBW-FSGS P Value NBW-MCNS P Value
Cases, n 31 8 10 13
Total glomerular number 24.5±12.3 15.9±10.0 24.5±5.4a 0.04 29.7±14.9a 0.04
Total cortical area, mm2 8.5±3.4 10.1±4.3 7.7±2.3 0.24 8.2±3.4 0.24
IF/TA, % 5.6±11.2 11.9±14.7 7.5±13.0 0.36 0.4±11.4 0.07
Global glomerular sclerosis, % 0 (0–0) 0 (0–1.2) 1.85 (0–4.5) 0.46 0 (0–0) 0.37
Focal segmental sclerosis, % 2.6±5.1 2.3±4.4 6.2±7.0 0.15 0 0.37
GV (× 106 μm3) 1.8 (1.4–2.6) 4.0 (3.0–5.1) 1.6 (1.5–2.1)a <0.001 1.3 (1.1–1.8)a <0.001
GD excluding globally sclerotic glomeruli, /mm2 3.0±1.4 1.4±0.6 3.3±1.2a 0.002 3.6±1.1a <0.001
GD including globally sclerotic glomeruli, /mm2 3.0±1.3 1.4±0.6 3.4±1.1a 0.001 3.6±1.1a <0.001

LBW-FSGS, low birth weight–FSGS; NBW-FSGS, normal birth weight–FSGS; NBW-MCNS, normal birth weight–minimal change nephrotic syndrome; IF/TA, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy; GV, glomerular volume; GD, glomerular density. Data are expressed as mean±SD or median with interquartile range (25th–75th percentile).

a

P<0.05 versus LBW-FSGS.