Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;55(2):95–107. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0046

Table 2. Estimated structural equation paths, and covariances.

Estimated path B (SE) t p
AL (T1) → PJ 0.55** (0.08) 7.24 .000
AL (T1) → EE 0.00 (0.08) 0.04 .969
PJ (T2) → EE −0.32** (0.07) −4.38 .000
ED (T2) → EE 0.27** (0.07) 3.96 .000
PJ x ED → EE −0.14* (0.07) −2.01 .044
EE (T1) → EE 0.44** (0.05) 8.40 .000
N (T3) → EE 0.35** (0.07) 5.12 .000

AL → PJ → EE −0.18** (0.05) −3.90 .000

Covariances B (SE) t p

ED (T2) ↔ AL (T1) −0.02 (0.03) −0.73 .467
EE (T1) ↔ AL (T1) −0.18** (0.05) −4.01 .000
EE (T1) ↔ ED (T2) 0.47** (0.07) 7.16 .000
N (T3) ↔ AL (T1) −0.07° (0.04) −1.79 .073
N (T3) ↔ ED (T2) 0.28** (0.06) 4.57 .000
N (T3) ↔ EE (T1) 0.75** (0.09) 8.09 .000

Note. N=628, number of teams=168, number of missing data patterns=34.

AL=authentic leadership, EE=emotional exhaustion, PJ=procedural justice, ED=emotional demands, N=Neuroticism. Model fit indices: H0 LogLL: −1,6617.315, H0 Scaling correction factor for MLR: 1.338, H1 LogLL: −1,6346.053, Information criteria: AIC: 3,3380.629, BIC: 3,3704.935, Adjusted-BIC: 3,3473.169, df=73.

°p<.10, *p<.05, **p<.01, two-tailed.