Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 2;55(2):127–137. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0155

Table 2. Outcomes comparing the high and low odour score groupsa in 2008, 2010 and 2012, and within the odour score groupsa from 2008 to 2012.

2008 2010 2012 2012 vs 2008 p for interaction

MDb (95% CI) SMDc p
Total SHC scored
High odour scorea 13.54 12.37 12.32 −1.35 (−2.52, −0.18) −2.26 0.02 0.16
Low odour scorea 9.52 8.81 8.87 −0.19 (−1.32, 0.94) −0.32 0.75
MDb (95% CI) 3.70 (2.03, 5.37) 2.83 (1.05, 4.61) 2.54 (0.63, 4.45)
SMDc 4.34 3.12 2.61
p <0.001 0.002 0.009
Subjective neurological complaints scored
High odour scorea 3.07 2.51 2.61 −0.42 (−0.77, −0.07) −2.35 0.02 0.04
Low odour scorea 1.83 1.89 1.85 0.08 (−0.26, 0.39) 0.48 0.63
MDb (95% CI) 1.02 (0.56, 1.49) 0.53 (0.02, 1.03) 0.52 (−0.02, 1.06)
SMDc 4.29 2.04 1.88
p <0.001 0.04 0.06
Total IES-R scoree
High odour scorea 7.52 5.35 3.55 −4.16 (−5.19, −3.14) −7.99 <0.001 <0.001
Low odour scorea 2.11 1.38 1.17 −0.81 (−1.79, 0.16) −1.63 0.10
MDb (95% CI) 4.59 (3.23, 5.95) 2.94 (1.68, 4.20) 1.24 (0.05, 2.44)
SMDc 6.62 4.56 2.04
p <0.001 <0.001 0.04

a Odour score computed as the percentage of months each participant had noticed the specific foul odour. The participants were divided by the odour score median (31.25) into the high odour score and the low odour score groups, respectively.

b Mean difference.

c Standardized mean difference.

d Scores from the Subjective Health Complaints Inventory (SHC).

e Scores from the Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R).