Table 4. Overall Participant Satisfaction with LSPAN.
| Clarity of information presented | Helpfulness of meeting | Rating of group leader | Expectations | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| LSPAN Meeting | Clear | Somewhat clear | Not applicable | Very helpful | Helpful | Somewhat helpful | Excellent | Good | Exceeded | Met | Somewhat met |
| 1: Nov 2012 (n = 13) | 85 % | 15 % | 0% | 77 % | 23 % | 0% | 69 % | 31 % | 62 % | 23 % | 8% |
| 2: Feb. 2013 (n = 13) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 85 % | 15 % | 0% | 77 % | 23 % | 38 % | 54 % | 8% |
| 3: May 2013 (n = 8) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 63 % | 38 % | 0% | 75 % | 25 % | 50 % | 38 % | 13 % |
| 4: Sep. 2013 (n = 8) | 88 % | 13 % | 0% | 75 % | 25 % | 0% | 88 % | 13 % | 50 % | 50 % | 0% |
| 6: Jun 2014 (n = 5) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 60 % | 40 % | 0% | 100 % | 0% | 20 % | 60 % | 20 % |
| 7: Sep. 2014 (n = 4) | 50 % | 25 % | 25 % | 50 % | 25 % | 25 % | 75 % | 25 % | 33 %* | 67 %* | 0 %* |
| 8: Dec 2014 (n = 3) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 67 % | 33 % | 0% | 67 % | 33 % | 33 % | 67 % | 0% |
| 9: Jun 2015 (n = 6) | 83 % | 17 % | 0% | 17 % | 50 % | 33 % | 83 % | 17 % | 0% | 83 % | 17 % |
| 10: Sep. 2015 (n = 8) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 38 % | 63 % | 0% | 63 % | 38 % | 13 % | 88 % | 0% |
| 11: Dec 2015 (n = 2) | 100 % | 0% | 0% | 50 % | 50 % | 0% | 100 % | 0% | 50 % | 50 % | 0% |
| MEAN | 91 % | 7% | 3% | 58 % | 36 % | 6% | 80 % | 20 % | 35 % | 58 % | 6% |
Survey data from LSPAN5 (Dec 2013, n = 3) unavailable. 0 % of participants rated clarity of information as unclear, helpfulness of meeting as somewhat or not helpful, group leader as fair or poor, and expectations as not met.
*
1 respondent left “expectations” blank, % is out of n = 3