Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;24(3):262–274. doi: 10.5551/jat.36467

Table 3. Baseline and follow-up EFV and EFVi levels according to follow-up CT results.

Total
(n = 122)
Follow-up cardiac CT
Overall P
No plaque Calcified plaque Non-calcified plaque
(n = 50) (n = 48) (n = 24)
EFV (cm3)
- Baseline 120.12 ± 49.48 110.95 ± 45.80 116.74 ± 46.27 146.00 ± 55.96* 0.013
- Follow-up 125.97 ± 53.93 119.39 ± 50.61 122.35 ± 55.59 146.93 ± 54.33 0.100
- Change 5.85 ± 2.65 8.43 ± 2.94 5.61 ± 2.64 0.93 ± 1.96 0.524
- Change (%) 7.36 ± 24.26 12.12 ± 29.43 5.17 ± 21.53 1.81 ± 14.57 0.168

EFVi (cm3/m2)
- Baseline 66.41 ± 25.84 62.52 ± 24.72 63.71 ± 22.71 79.93 ± 30.30* 0.016
- Follow-up 69.97 ± 28.13 67.37 ± 27.28 67.01 ± 27.53 81.28 ± 29.37 0.094
- Change 3.52 ± 14.57 4.86 ± 16.54 3.27 ± 14.04 1.23 ± 11.03 0.601
- Change (%) 7.52 ± 23.48 11.98 ± 28.92 5.38 ± 20.29 2.51 ± 14.04 0.193

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P values were calculated by ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons.

*

P < 0.05 versus “No plaque” group

P < 0.05 versus “Calcified plaque” group

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; EFV, epicardial fat volume; EFVi, epicardial fat volume index.