Table 6.
Traits | Treatment (mM-NaCl) | Treatment mean | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
(A) | |||
Shoot length (cm) | 0 | 11.71 | A |
Shoot length (cm) | 100 | 8.79 | B |
Shoot length (cm) | 200 | 7.54 | C |
Tap root LENGTH (cm) | 0 | 3.99 | A |
Tap root Length (cm) | 100 | 2.72 | B |
Tap root length (cm) | 200 | 2.64 | B |
No. of lateral roots | 0 | 22.31 | A |
No. of lateral roots | 100 | 15.11 | B |
No. of lateral roots | 200 | 8.83 | C |
Total chlorophyll | 0 | 3.704 | A |
Total chlorophyll | 100 | 2.212 | B |
Total chlorophyll | 200 | 1.125 | C |
Traits | Plant lines | Mean of plants | Significance |
(B) | |||
Shoot length (cm) | L1-5 | 10.46 | A |
Shoot length (cm) | L8-3 | 10.26 | A |
Shoot length (cm) | L16-2 | 10.10 | A |
Shoot length (cm) | Control | 6.57 | B |
Tap root length (cm) | L1-5 | 3.70 | A |
Tap root length (cm) | L8-3 | 3.48 | A |
Tap root length (cm) | L16-2 | 3.48 | A |
Tap root length (cm) | Control | 1.80 | B |
No. of lateral roots | L1-5 | 18.67 | A |
No. of lateral roots | L8-3 | 18.33 | A |
No. of lateral roots | L16-2 | 16.70 | A |
No. of lateral roots | Control | 7.96 | B |
Total chlorophyll | L1-5 | 2.41 | AB |
Total chlorophyll | L8-3 | 2.66 | A |
Total chlorophyll | L16-2 | 2.33 | AB |
Total chlorophyll | Control | 2.00 | B |
Based on Two-way ANOVA results, treatments mean (A), and plant lines data (B) were compared by Turkey-Kramer test at 5% LSD. The treatments were significant, different alphabet letters were indicated. Similar letters denotes non-significant.