Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;7:45916. doi: 10.1038/srep45916

Table 6. Comparison of conjunctival hemodynamic descriptors in venules between C and DR subjects in unadjusted (Model 1) and adjusted (Model 2) models.

  D (μm) V (mm/s) Q (pl/s) WSR (s−1) WSS (dyne /cm2)
β P β P β P β P β P
Intercept 20 <0.001 0.59 <0.001 173 <0.001 183 <0.001 4.8 <0.001
Model 1: DR Stage Effect*
C Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
NDR 1.2 0.03 −0.05 0.2 5 0.8 −29 0.01 −1.1 0.001
NPDR 1.4 0.02 −0.01 0.7 25 0.1 −19 0.1 −0.9 0.008
PDR 0.4 0.52 −0.06 0.1 4 0.8 −29 0.02 −1.2 <0.001
Intercept 19 <0.001 0.49 0.004 151 0.05 185 0.001 3.4 0.03
Model 2: DR Stage Effect**
C Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
NDR 1.4 0.03 −0.06 0.2 7 0.7 −33 0.01 −1.1 0.004
NPDR 2.1 0.006 −0.03 0.6 26 0.2 −29 0.05 −1.1 0.02
PDR 1.1 0.19 −0.11 0.04 −6 0.8 −47 0.003 −1.4 0.002

C, NDR, NPDR, and PDR are abbreviations for non-diabetic control, no clinically visible diabetic retinopathy, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, respectively. D, V, Q, WSR, and WSS are abbreviations for diameter, axial blood velocity, blood flow, wall shear rate and wall shear stress, respectively. Bold indicates statistical significance.

*Unadjusted.

**Adjusted for age, race, sex, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, hematocrit, and hemoglobin A1C.