Table 7. Comparison of association between conjunctival V and D in venules between C and DR subjects in unadjusted (Model 1) and adjusted (Model 2) models.
Slope (s−1) | 95% CI | P-value* | |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1: DR Stage Effect | |||
C | 18a | 16–21 | Ref |
NDR | 18a | 16–19 | 0.6 |
NPDR | 22a | 20–23 | 0.01b |
PDR | 21a | 19–23 | 0.1 |
Model 2: DR Stage Effect | P-value** | ||
C | 18a | 16–21 | Ref |
NDR | 18a | 16–19 | 0.5 |
NPDR | 22a | 20–23 | 0.01b |
PDR | 21a | 19–23 | 0.1 |
Slopes of the regression lines relating V and D are provided. C, NDR, NPDR, and PDR are abbreviations for non-diabetic control, no clinically visible diabetic retinopathy, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, respectively. Bold indicates statistical significance.
aSignificant association between V and D.
bAssociation between V and D significantly different than C (ref).
*Unadjusted.
**Adjusted for age, race, sex, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, hematocrit, and hemoglobin A1C.