Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;17:71. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1022-6

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

AIP1 and AIP3 have divergent expression patterns. a RNA from the indicated organs was isolated and used to assess AIP1 and AIP3 transcript levels as described in the methods. Organs examined were 4–5-day-old seedlings, stage 5 leaves, green stem, green siliques, stage 9 flowers, and stage 15 flowers. Relative gene expression profiles ± SE after ACTIN2 normalization are depicted. Data presented is representative of two independent biological replicas each with three samples repetitions ± SE. b-h GUS representative expression profiles for AIP1 (750 bp of 5′ putative promoter) promoter-driven GUS transgenic lines