Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 27;149:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.056

Table 2.

Summary statistics of empirical coverage of the nominal 95% confidence interval for a true correlation coefficient for simulation study Scenarios 2 and 3.

ρ function k window size Coverage in percent our method aveg. (Q1, Q2, Q3) Coverage in percent Fisher aveg. (Q1, Q2, Q3)

sine k=1 30 95.14 (92.99, 95.62, 97.58) 99.42 (99.28, 100, 100)
45 96.02 (93.51, 96.65, 99.90) 99.03 (98.43, 100, 100)
k=2 30 95.11 (92.89, 95.46, 98.14) 99.39 (99.59, 100, 100)
45 95.91 (93.43, 96.75, 99.90) 98.92 (98.43, 100, 100)
k=3 30 94.23 (91.78, 95.05, 97.32) 99.25(98.76, 100, 100)
45 94.08 (90.99, 95.08, 98.19) 98.11 (96.47, 100, 100)
k=4 30 92.55 (89.41, 93.09, 96.49) 98.76 (97.94, 100, 100)
45 88.86 (84.50, 89.32, 94.24) 95.72 (93.32, 96.54, 99.63)

Gaussian k=1 30 94.21 (91.48, 94.64, 97.19) 99.28 (98.87, 100, 100)
45 94.16 (91.84, 94.87, 97.15) 97.92 (96.57, 98.33, 100)
k=2 30 94.62 (92.38, 95.42, 97.43) 99.45 (99.38, 100, 100)
45 95.02 (92.31, 95.61, 98.20) 98.54 (97.41, 100, 100)
k=3 30 94.76 (92.74, 95.62, 97.53) 99.46 (99.38, 100, 100)
45 95.47 (92.89, 95.97, 99.14) 98.80 (97.91, 100, 100)
k=4 30 94.89 (92.69, 95.73, 97.84) 99.46 (99.38, 100, 100)
45 95.60 (93.44, 96.18, 99.48) 98.89 (97.91, 100, 100)