Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 31;12:619–628. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S131903

Table 1.

Study design quality assessment based on Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale

Study 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total score
Arcolin et al26 X X X X X X X 6
Carvalho et al38,* X X X X X X X X 7
Combs et al27 X X X X X X X X 7
Corcos et al28 X X X X X X X X 7
Dibble et al29 X X X X X X X X 8
Mateos-Toset et al30 X X X X X X X X 7
Paul et al31 X X X X X X X X X 8
Ridgel et al33,* X X X X X X X 6
Schlenstedt et al32 X X X X X X 6
Shen and Mak34 X X X X X X X X 7
Shen and Mak35 X X X X X X X X 7
Shen and Mak36 X X X X X X X X X 8
Volpe et al37 X X X X X X X X X 8

Notes: PEDro criteria: 1, eligibility criteria (not used to calculate the PEDro score); 2, random allocation; 3, concealed allocation; 4, baseline comparability; 5, blind subjects; 6, blind therapists; 7, blind assessors; 8, adequate follow-up; 9, intention-to-treat analysis; 10, between-group comparisons; 11, point estimates and variability provided;

*

PEDro score attributed by the authors.

Abbreviation: PEDro, Physiotherapy Evidence Database.