Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;12(4):e0175280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175280

Table 2. Correlation between MYL9 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of ESCC.

Characteristic MYL9 expression p
Low High
No.cases (%) No.cases (%)
Gender Male 47(72.3) 47(66.2) 0.463
Female 18(27.7) 24(33.8)
Age (years) <60 36(55.4) 36(50.7) 0.61
≥60 29(44.6) 35(49.3)
Clinical stage I-II 37(56.9) 38(53.5) 0.732
III 28(43.1) 33(46.5)
T classification T1-T2 15(23.1) 18(25.4) 0.842
T3-T4 50(76.9) 53(74.6)
N classification N0 34(52.3) 33(46.5) 0.607
N1-2 31(47.7) 38(53.5)
Differentiation Well or Moderate 53(81.5) 46(64.8) 0.028
Poor 12(18.5) 25(35.2)
Location Upper 7(10.8) 3(4.2) 0.317
Middle 42(64.6) 47(66.2)
Lower 16(24.6) 21(29.6)
Recurrence No 37(56.9) 20(28.2) 0.01
Yes 28(43.1) 51(71.8)
Vital status Alive 44(67.7) 23(32.4) <0.01
(at follow-up) Death (tumor-related) 21(32.3) 46(64.8)
Death (tumor-unrelated) 0(0) 2(2.8)
Therapy Surgery only 62(95.4) 67(94.4) 0.549
Surgery+CT or RT or CRT 3(4.6) 4(5.6)

p-values were analyzed by χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; CRT, combination of CT and RT (chemoradiotherapy).