Table 3.
Participants’ attitudes and beliefs about screening.
| Outcome | Intervention (n = 58) | Control (n = 28) | P-value adjusted1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | ||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
| KnowledgeA | 8.9 (3.1) | 11.6 (2.4) | 9.2 (2.9) | 9.6 (2.5) | <0.012 |
| Decisional conflictA | — | 11.0 (16.7) | — | 39.6 (27.7) | <0.013 |
| Informed subscaleA | — | 15.8 (27.8) | — | 58.0 (38.8) | <0.014 |
| Values clarity subscaleA | — | 16.7 (28.1) | — | 38.9 (40.0) | <0.015 |
| Support subscaleA | — | 5.2 (15.0) | — | 18.5 (24.2) | <0.016 |
| Uncertainty subscaleA | — | 6.0 (17.1) | — | 44.4 (44.6) | <0.017 |
| Patient self-advocacyA,B | — | 1.6 (0.3) | — | 1.8 (0.3) | 0.018 |
| Attitudes about screeningA,B | 9.7 (2.0) | 9.4 (2.2) | 8.9 (1.7) | 8.6 (2.3) | 0.499 |
| Perceived normative pressureA,B | 10.5 (2.2) | 10.6 (1.9) | 11.6 (2.0) | 10.6 (2.2) | 0.4910 |
| Intention to get screenedA,B | 12.5 (2.1) | 13.0 (1.5) | 12.1 (2.6) | 12.8 (1.6) | 0.6911 |
Abbreviations: SD = Standard Deviation
Based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.
Based on the Integrative Model of Behavior.
Two-sided Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) significance test.
Interpretations, score ranges, and model adjustments:
Adjusted for health literacy, education, and marital status.
Adjusted for baseline knowledge score, health literacy, and education.
Adjusted for baseline knowledge score, health literacy, and education.
Adjusted for health literacy and education.
Adjusted for age and health insurance.
Adjusted for health literacy and education.
Adjusted for marital status.
Adjusted for baseline attitude and marital status.
Adjusted for baseline norms, health literacy, and age.
Adjusted for baseline intentions score, health literacy, education, health insurance, and age.