Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 23;7:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2017.03.001

Table 4.

Comparison of antiresorptive agents.

Agent Advantages Limitations Long-term safety
Oral bisphosphonates
  • Oral (self) administration

  • Limited efficacy data available

  • Need to follow strict dosing guidelines

  • Poor compliance and persistence

  • No data for risedronate or alendronate to assess effects on underlying breast cancer

  • Established in the osteoporosis setting

  • Generally well tolerated

IV bisphosphonates (Zoledronate)
  • Efficacy data from large trials with long follow-up

  • Can be administered during routine twice-yearly oncologist visits

  • Compliance can be ensured

  • IV administration by healthcare provider

  • Established in the osteoporosis and AIBL settings

  • Generally well tolerated

  • Adverse events are generally mild and manageable

Denosumab
  • Can be administered during routine twice-yearly oncologist visits or administration by healthcare provider

  • Compliance can be ensured

  • Limited efficacy data available

  • Rebound effect after treatment termination

  • Costs

  • Established in the osteoporosis and AIBL settings with anti-fracture efficacy in both

  • Generally well tolerated

  • Adverse events are generally mild and manageable

Abbreviations: AIBL, aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss; IV, intravenous; sc, subcutaneous.