Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 3;475(5):1395–1410. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5218-0

Table 3.

Comparison of imaging techniques in diagnosing periprosthetic knee infection using the z-test

Imaging techniques compared Sensitivity Specificity
Technique 1 Technique 2 Technique 1 Technique 2 Comparison (p value) Technique 1 Technique 2 Comparison (p value)
BS BS-LS 0.93 0.87 0.39 0.56 0.82 < 0.001
LS BS-LS 0.88 0.87 0.89 0.77 0.82 0.44
LS BS 0.88 0.93 0.34 0.77 0.56 < 0.001
LS LS-BMS 0.88 0.80 0.24 0.77 0.93 < 0.001
LS-BMS BS 0.80 0.93 0.08 0.93 0.56 < 0.001
LS-BMS BS-LS 0.80 0.87 0.47 0.93 0.82 < 0.001
AGS BS 0.90 0.93 0.60 0.95 0.56 < 0.001
AGS BS-LS 0.90 0.87 0.70 0.95 0.82 0.01
AGS LS 0.90 0.88 0.72 0.95 0.77 < 0.001
AGS LS-BMS 0.90 0.80 0.21 0.95 0.93 0.47
FDG-PET BS 0.70 0.93 0.06 0.84 0.56 < 0.001
FDG-PET BS-LS 0.70 0.87 0.11 0.84 0.82 0.73
FDG-PET LS 0.70 0.88 0.01 0.84 0.77 0.21
FDG-PET LS-BMS 0.70 0.80 0.30 0.84 0.93 < 0.001
FDG-PET AGS 0.70 0.90 0.02 0.84 0.95 0.02

BS = bone scintigraphy; LS = leukocyte scintigraphy; BMS = bone marrow scintigraphy; AGS = antigranulocyte scintigraphy; FDG-PET = fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography.