Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 21;117(4):1713–1719. doi: 10.1152/jn.01009.2015

Table 1.

Measures of average similarity for different time periods after the eRT, computed from the cumulative distribution plots in Fig. 6

Time Period After eRT Average Similarity Between
Trials of the Same Task,
Both Quiet Cues
Average Similarity Between
Trials of Different Tasks,
Both Quiet Cues
Average Similarity Between
Trials of the Same Task,
Both Loud Cues
Average Similarity Between
Trials of the Same Task,
Quiet Cues Compared
with Loud Cues
0–10 ms 0.913 0.700 0.908* 0.906
10–20 ms 0.901 0.673 0.895* 0.892
20–30 ms 0.898 0.665 0.891* 0.889
50–100 ms 0.921 0.687* 0.921 0.918

Similarity measures in the 3rd and 4th columns were compared and did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). eRT, earliest reaction time.

*

P < 0.05.

P < 10−4, significantly different (t-test) from the similarity between trials of the same task following quiet cues (1st column).