Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 8;6:74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0469-8

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies for meta-analyses

Studies and parameters Comments
Comparison Antivenom vs. standard therapy (new world scorpions)
 Boyer et al. 2009 [20]
  Methods Randomized double blind study
  Participants Children and adults aged between 6 months and 18 years admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit within 5 h since a scorpion sting
  Interventions The test group (n = 8) received scorpion antivenom against Centruroides sp. while the control group (n = 7) received a placebo. Dose: three vials diluted in 50 ml of saline. Both groups received similar supportive care.
  Outcomes Resolution of clinical syndrome within 4 h of antivenom administration, cumulative midazolam dose required for sedation and serum venom levels up to 4 h post admission, adverse events
  Study location Arizona, USA
 Boyer et al. 2013 [19]
  Methods Controlled study with trial arm recruited prospectively and compared with a retrospective control group
  Participants Children and adults aged between 6 months and 18 years admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit within 5 h since a scorpion sting
  Interventions The prospectively recruited subjects (n = 78) received scorpion antivenom against Centruroides sp. while the control group (n = 97) had been managed without antivenom. Three vials of antivenom were administered within 10 min diluted in 50 ml of saline. Two additional vials were administered at the discretion of the physician if symptoms had not resolved at 1 or 2 h since the initial dose.
  Outcomes Resolution of clinical syndrome within 4 h of antivenom administration, serum venom levels up to 4 h post admission (in prospective group only), adverse events
  Study location Arizona, USA and Morelos, Mexico
 LoVecchio et al. 2003 [18]
  Methods Observational study without randomization
  Participants Children aged less than 2 years with either a witnessed scorpion sting or signs and symptoms consistent with scorpion envenoming
  Interventions Severity was graded on a scale of I–IV with grades III and IV having systemic envenoming. A subset of patients with grade III and IV envenoming had received anti-Centruroides antivenom (1 vial diluted in 50 ml of saline, n = 86). Another 46 children did not receive antivenom despite having grade III and IV envenoming. Criteria for administration of antivenom are not clear.
  Outcomes Meantime for resolution/improvement of systemic envenoming, adverse events, deaths
  Study location Arizona, USA
Comparison Antivenom vs. standard therapy (old world scorpions)
 Abroug et al. 1999 [15]
  Methods Prospective randomized controlled trial
  Participants Patients with scorpion stings older than 10 years. A total of 825 patients were randomly allocated to test (n = 412) and control arms (n = 413)
  Interventions The test group received 20 ml of bivalent (A. australis and B. occitanus) scorpion antivenom. Both groups received supportive care with steroids, fluid replacement, antihistamines and life-supporting measures for systemic envenoming as required.
  Outcomes Severity was graded as I (no systemic envenoming) and II (systemic envenoming). Prevention was defined as non-progression from grade I to II, and cure was defined as reversal of symptoms from grade II. Outcomes were defined after 4 h since administration of antivenom or admission.
Other monitored outcomes were death, complications of envenoming and adverse effects attributable to antivenom.
  Study location Tunisia
 Belghith et al. 1999 [16]
  Methods Retrospective analysis of a sub-population of patients enrolled for a clinical trial. Control group selected prospectively
  Participants Patients with scorpion stings older than 10 years. One hundred and thirty five patients who were administered bivalent antivenom for scorpion during a previous trial had their records re-examined and matched with controls on a pair-match basis.
  Interventions No prospective intervention. Controls did not receive antivenom.
  Outcomes Severity was graded as I (no systemic envenoming) and II (systemic envenoming). Prevention was defined as non-progression from grade I to II, and cure was defined as reversal of symptoms from grade II. Outcomes were defined after 4 h since administration of antivenom or admission.
Other monitored outcomes were death, complications of envenoming and adverse effects attributable to antivenom.
  Study location Tunisia
Comparison Antivenom plus prazosin vs. prazosin
 Bawaskar et al. 2011 [23]
  Methods Randomised open label clinical trial
  Participants Patients older than 6 months, reporting to hospital within 6 h of the sting and of grade II clinical severity (systemic autonomic symptoms without shock). A total of 70 patients were randomized, 35 each to test and control groups.
  Interventions The test group received Haffkine Biopharma monovalent scorpion antivenom (against M. tamulus) 30 ml dissolved in 100 ml of normal saline and infused over 30 min. Both groups received either 250 μg (under 18 years of age) or 500 μg of oral prazosin at 3 hourly intervals until the extremities were cold (resolution of peripheral vasodilatation).
  Outcomes Primary endpoint: resolution of grade II clinical syndrome at 10 h and prevention of progression to a higher grade (III, IV characterized by autonomic symptoms plus shock, pulmonary oedema)
Secondary endpoints: time to total resolution of clinical syndrome, total dose of prazosin required within 10 h and adverse events
  Study location Maharashtra, India
 Natu et al. 2010 [22]
  Methods Prospective open label clinical trial
  Participants Patients aged 12–70 with a confirmed scorpion sting. The authors developed a composite clinical score based (minimum and maximum scores were 0 and 25, respectively) on pulse rate, blood pressure, presence of priapism, sweating, pain and neurological symptoms. Scores between 5 and 21 were included in the study. The enrolled were randomized into three trial arms: prazosin alone (n = 25), prazosin and antivenom (n = 28) and antivenom alone (n = 28).
  Interventions Haffkine monovalent antivenom was administered dissolved in distilled water (1:1) over 5–7 min intravenously. The total dose of antivenom was decided based on composite clinical score and patient’s age. The doses varied between 20 and 80 ml. Prazosin was administered orally at 3 hourly intervals at a dose of 500 μg (<20 kg body wt) or 1 mg (>20 kg body wt).
  Outcomes Primary endpoint: time to resolution of clinical symptoms
  Study location Maharashtra, India
 Pandi et al. 2014 [24]
  Methods Randomized controlled trial
  Participants Children aged less than 13 years were randomized into test (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. Grading of severity of sting was as according to Bawaskar et al.
  Interventions The test group received monovalent Haffkine antivenom according to protocol described by Bawaskar et al. Both groups received prazosin at a dose of 30 μg/kg/dose at 3 hourly intervals until resolution of the clinical syndrome.
  Outcomes Primary endpoint: time to resolution of clinical syndrome
Secondary endpoints: total dose of prazosin required, adverse events, prevention of worsening of clinical syndrome and duration of hospital stay
  Study location Pondicherry, India