Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 8;10:86. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0777-1

Table 4.

Hydrolyzability of various substrates

Substrate Hydrolytic condition Enzymatic hydrolysis (%) Source
Variety Pretreatment type Solid Cellulase Time
% Variety (FPU/g) Loading h
C. inophyllum shell H2SO4 + NaOH 10 Accellerase™ 1500 72 50 (RS) Cheng et al. [26]
Bamboo shoot hull 9% Na3PO4 +3% H2O2 1 Accellerase™ 1500 30 72 86 (RS) Qing et al. [14]
EFB AAO − AQA 2 Cellulase 1.5 L 15 96 73 Kim et al. [22]
E. ulmoides Oliver SEP + AHP 5 Youtell cellulase 20 96 83 (G) Zhu et al. [15]
Cashew apple bagasse 4.3% AHP 9 Novozymes cellulase 15 72 86 (G) da Costa et al. [13]
Lespedeza stalk SEP + AHP 5 Cellulase 1.5 L 12.4 96 89 (G) Su et al. [27]
Sugarcane bagasse AAO 2.5 Cellulase 1.5 L 20 120 63 (RS) Zhao et al. [10]
Corn stover 3% H2O2 + 7.5 g/L NaOH 6 Spezyme CP 30 72 35(G) He et al. [21]
Corn stover HCl + H2O2 5 Novozymes cellulase 3 72 71 (G) Li et al. [16]
Sugarcane bagasse 2% H2SO4 + 4.7% H2O2 10 Celluclast 1.5 L 4.1 120 65 (G) Morando et al. [17]
TOFH None 5 GC220 50 48 39 (RS) Sun et al. [7]
TOFH AGO 5 GC220 20 48 80 (RS) Sun et al. [7]
TOFH AAO 5 Cellic CTec2 15 48 50 (RS) This paper
TOFH AAO + AHP 5 Cellic CTec2 3 48 85 (RS) This paper

EFB empty fruit bunches, SEP steam explosion pretreatment, AQA aqueous ammonia, G glucose, RS reducing sugars