Table 3.
Comparison of the mean differences of Pender’s Health Promotion Model components before and after intervention in the experimental and control groups
| Components | Group | Mean difference | Standard deviation | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived benefits | Intervention | -36.700034 | 6.55149 | <0.001 | |
| Control | -3.37037 | 3.52098 | 0.44 | ||
| Perceived barriers | Intervention | 33.19865 | 7.76374 | <0.001 | |
| Control | 0.57239 | 4.2619 | 0.32 | ||
| Behavior-related affect | Positive affect | Intervention | 45.57576 | 3.19051 | <0.001 |
| Control | 0.77233 | 5.18488 | 0.55 | ||
| Negative affect | Intervention | 16.72278 | 2.20183 | <0.001 | |
| Control | 32.99663 | 6.12223 | <0.001 | ||
| Perceived self-efficacy | Intervention | -34.13580 | 10.79512 | <0.001 | |
| Control | -0.58642 | 4.30929 | 0.32 | ||
| Situational influences | Intervention | 4.91944 | 8.76727 | <0.001 | |
| Control | 0.45093 | 3.17567 | 0.35 | ||
| Interpersonal influences | Interpersonal norms | Intervention | -27.93266 | 11.62759 | <0.001 |
| Control | -33.15152 | 6.72287 | <0.001 | ||
| Interpersonal modeling | Intervention | -17.42424 | 7.86376 | <0.001 | |
| Control | -26.36364 | 7.62852 | <0.001 | ||
| Commitment to action | Intervention | -20.64815 | 7.28584 | <0.001 | |
| Control | 0.58457 | 6.34904 | 0.50 | ||
| Nutritional behavior | Intervention | -37.33796 | 5.82795 | <0.001 | |
| Control | 0.68451 | 5.34902 | 0.62 | ||
Paired t test