Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;5(2):165–174.

Table 3.

Comparison of the mean differences of Pender’s Health Promotion Model components before and after intervention in the experimental and control groups

Components Group Mean difference Standard deviation P value*
Perceived benefits Intervention -36.700034 6.55149 <0.001
Control -3.37037 3.52098 0.44
Perceived barriers Intervention 33.19865 7.76374 <0.001
Control 0.57239 4.2619 0.32
Behavior-related affect Positive affect Intervention 45.57576 3.19051 <0.001
Control 0.77233 5.18488 0.55
Negative affect Intervention 16.72278 2.20183 <0.001
Control 32.99663 6.12223 <0.001
Perceived self-efficacy Intervention -34.13580 10.79512 <0.001
Control -0.58642 4.30929 0.32
Situational influences Intervention 4.91944 8.76727 <0.001
Control 0.45093 3.17567 0.35
Interpersonal influences Interpersonal norms Intervention -27.93266 11.62759 <0.001
Control -33.15152 6.72287 <0.001
Interpersonal modeling Intervention -17.42424 7.86376 <0.001
Control -26.36364 7.62852 <0.001
Commitment to action Intervention -20.64815 7.28584 <0.001
Control 0.58457 6.34904 0.50
Nutritional behavior Intervention -37.33796 5.82795 <0.001
Control 0.68451 5.34902 0.62
*

Paired t test