Table 3.
Brain activity due to cognitive challenges to static balance control.
Name, year | Balance challenge | Modality | Mobile | Spatial location | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adkin et al., 2008 | Perturbation under postural threat | EEG | No | Cz | Perturbation evoked N100 amplitude |
Fujita et al., 2016 | Stroop task during bipedal vs. unipedal standing | fNIRS | No | Rt. DLPFC | Increased activation |
Huang et al., 2014 | Tilt platform using visual feedback | EEG | No | Bi. lat. fronto-central and contralateral sensorimotor areas | Latency and amplitude of N100 for postural control |
Bi. lat. fronto-central and ipsilateral temporal areas | Latency and amplitude of P200 for postural control | ||||
Lt. frontal-central area | MRP for postural control | ||||
Lau et al., 2014 | Visual oddball response task while standing or walking | EEG | No | Sensorimotor cortex | Effective connectivity |
PFC, posterior parietal cortex, ACC | Effective connectivity | ||||
Little and Woollacott, 2015 | Visual WM capacity during surface perturbations and walking | EEG | No | Lt. pre-motor and rt. sensory areas | Amplitude of N100 ERP |
Mirelman et al., 2014 | Walking while counting forward, walking with serial 7's and serial 7's in standing | fNIRS | No | Fp1 and Fp2 | Increased activation with increased task difficulty |
Quant et al., 2004 | Horizontal translations platform with or without a visuomotor track task | EEG | No | Cz | Amplitude of perturbation evoked N100 |
lt., left; rt., right; bi. lat., bilateral; PFC, prefrontal cortex; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; MRP, movement related potential.