Table 3.

Estimates from linear regression analyses for physical activity volume [total activity counts (TAC, number/day)^a and steps (number/day)]

Predictor	TAC (n/day)						Steps (n/day)
	Crude		Adjusted				Crude		Adjusted
			Model 2c		Model 3d				Model 4c		Model 5e
	(n = 141)b		(n = 141)b fit on a line		(n = 131)		(n = 141)b		(n = 141)		(n = 138)
	β (95% CI)	P	β (95% CI)	P	β (95% CI)	P	β (95% CI)	P	β (95% CI)	P	β (95% CI)	P
Street Smart Walk Score (10-point change)	1.01 (0.97, 1.05)	0.546	1.02 (0.99, 1.07)	0.221	1.00 (0.96, 1.04)	0.991	51 (−148, 250)	0.612	102 (−93, 297)	0.304	−23 (−207, 160)	0.801
Women	0.98 (0.8, 1.21)	0.876	0.98 (0.8, 1.19)	0.816	0.90 (0.74, 1.10)	0.308	61 (−978, 1101)	0.907	31 (−975, 1038)	0.951	−347 (−1309, 616)	0.478
Age (10-year change)	0.74 (0.63, 0.87)*	<0.001	0.73 (0.62, 0.85)*	<0.001	0.81 (0.70, 0.95)*	0.011	−1298 (−2091,−505)*	0.002	−1362 (−2168,−557)*	0.001	−903 (−1642,−164)*	0.017
Vehicle available	0.86 (0.71, 1.06)	0.156	-	-	0.94 (0.79, 1.12)	0.495	−695 (−1687, 297)	0.168	-	-	−293 (−1150, 565)	0.500
Aestheticsf	1.23 (1.07, 1.42)*	0.004	-	-	1.08 (0.94, 1.23)	0.272	879 (178, 1580)*	0.014	-	-	233 (−415, 881)	0.478
Crimeg	1.11 (0.96, 1.28)	0.173	-	-	1.07 (0.95, 1.22)	0.272	-	-	-	-	-	-
Body mass index (kg/m2)	0.96 (0.94, 0.97)*	<0.001	-	-	0.97 (0.96, 0.99)*	0.004	−234 (−316,−152)*	<0.001	-	-	−162 (−245,−79)*	<0.001
Comorbiditiesh	0.92 (0.87, 0.96)*	<0.001	-	-	0.97 (0.92, 1.02)	0.180	−399 (−625,−173)*	0.001	-	-	−120 (−336, 97)	0.276
Gait speed (m/s)i	2.79 (1.94, 4.02)*	<0.001	-	-	1.40 (0.90, 2.18)	0.140	4816 (2997, 6635)*	<0.001	-	-	1738 (−397, 3873)	0.110
Very much like to walkj	1.67 (1.37, 2.04)*	<0.001	-	-	1.32 (1.07, 1.63)*	0.010	2495 (1519, 3471)*	<0.001	-	-	1342 (337, 2346)*	0.009
Ambulatory Confidencek	1.13 (1.06, 1.19)*	<0.001	-	-	1.01 (0.95, 1.09)	0.690	546 (259, 834)*	<0.001	-	-	98 (223, 418)	0.547

^aTAC (number/day) presented as exponentiated regression coefficients

^bn_{vehicle available} = 140; n_aesthetics = 140; n_{traffic hazards} = 135; n_{comorbidities} = 139

^cAdjusted for Street Smart Walk Score, gender, age

^dAdjusted for all predictor variables listed in this table

^eAdjusted for all predictor variables listed in this table with the exception of crime, since crime was not associated with steps (n/day) at p ≤ 0.2 in bivariate analyses

^f Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale—abbreviated (NEWS-A) Subscale F: Aesthetics (four-point scale); reverse coded so that higher score indicates better walkability

^gNEWS-A Subscale H: Crime (four-point scale); reverse coded so that higher score indicates better walkability

^hTotal number; measured with the Functional Comorbidity Index

ⁱAssessed as part of the 4-m walk (usual pace) component of the Short Physical Performance Battery

^jVery much like to walk (5 on a 5-point scale) vs. less than very much liking to walk (1–4 on a 5-point scale)

^kAssessed by the Ambulatory Self-Confidence Questionnaire

*p < 0.05