Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;28(7):947–961. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-08-0566

FIGURE 8:

FIGURE 8:

SVs rigorously bound by KinAG97E massively decorate MTs after latrunculin B treatment. (A) Localization of SVs labeled with GFP-RabERAB11 in the wt and in cells expressing rigor mutant kinesins with and without latB treatment. (B) Kymographs (10 µm long, starting at the apex) derived from time stacks of GFP-RabERAB11 images obtained from kinAG97E and uncAG116E cells treated with latB (600 frames/min). (C) Flux of anterograde and retrograde runs in regions described in B in five latB-treated hyphae for each genotype. The total number of runs per hypha and minute was determined by manual tracking on kymographs. Runs were classified as anterograde or retrograde and plotted as means with 95% CIs. The different data sets were compared by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison posttest. ***p < 0.001; n.s., nonsignificant. (D) KinAG97E cells coexpressing mCh-RabARAB5 to label EEs and GFP-RabERAB11 to label SVs. In the untreated KinAG97E control, SVs accumulate in the SPK and EEs in a slightly subapical aggregate. LatB treatment of KinAG97E cells shifts SVs from the SPK to MTs, which are conspicuously decorated with rigorously bound vesicles. Note that the tip accumulation of EEs is not dispersed by actin depolymerization (see also Supplemental Movies S15 and S16).