Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 22;5:9444. doi: 10.1038/srep09444

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Ethnicity Surgery Chemotherapy TNM Design N Follow-up(month) Biomarkers Method Cutoff High/low HR-E AHR ALL AUL
Lin 2012 China Asian Yes PB/A IB-IIIA R 169 53(3–66) OS ECLIA 3.30 63/106 HR 1.70 1.19 2.44
Tanaka 2013 Japan Asian NA TKI/M IIIB/IV R 160 32.5(23.3–44.6) PFS/OS ECLIA 2.00 83/77 HR 1.10 0.85 1.41
Park 2013 Korea Asian Yes NA I–III R 298 43.3(0.5–95.6) PFS/OS ECLIA 1.95 114/184 HR 1.10 1.01 1.20
Trapé 2012 Spain Caucasion No PB/M IIIA–IV P 137 NA OS ECLIA 3.30 91/46 HR 2.21 1.40 2.83
Edelman 2012 USA Mixed NA PB/NA IIIB/IV P 88 NA PFS/OS ECLIA 4.18 NA SC 1.68 1.33 2.11
Jung 2011 Korea Asian NA TKI/M IIIB/IV R 123 NA PFS/OS ECLIA 3.30 64/59 HR 2.76 1.38 5.53
Cedrés 2011 Spain Caucasion NA NA III–IV R 183 9.7(1–126) PFS/OS IRMA 3.30 119/64 SC 1.52 1.06 2.20
Hanagiri 2011 Japan Asian Yes PB/A I R 341 42 OS IRMA 2.00 145/196 HR 2.57 1.21 5.44
Ma 2011 China Asian NA NA I R 153 26(2–121) OS ECLIA 3.30 41/112 HR 9.81 1.64 58.67
Jin 2010 China Asian No PB/NA IIIB/IV R 111 NA OS ELISA 3.50 47/64 HR 1.68 1.05 2.69
Takahashi 2010 Japan Asian NA NA I–IV R 1202 NA OS CLEIA 18.00 NA HR 2.02 1.14 3.58
Petris 2011 Sweden Caucasion NA NA I–IV NA 174 NA OS ELISA 6.00 NA HR 0.80 0.73 1.32
Tomita 2010 Japan Asian Yes NA I–III R 291 60.7–141.7 OS NA 2.40 58/233 HR 1.57 1.29 1.89
Nisman 2009 Israel Asian No NA IIIA–IV P 88 NA OS ELISA 3.20 60/28 RR 1.80 1.10 2.80
Chen 2010 China Asian No TKI/M III–IV R 122 NA OS ELISA 3.30 49/73 HR 1.78 1.19 2.65
Chakra 2008 France Caucasion NA NA I–IV P 451 NA OS IRMA 3.60 224/227 HR 1.50 1.20 1.86
Jacot 2008 France Caucasion NA NA I–IV P 289 20.8(2.5–34.1) OS IRMA 3.60 92/197 HR 2.30 1.52 3.49
Ishikawa 2008 Japan Asian NA TKI/M IIIB/IV R 65 8.3(1.1–37.9) PFS/OS ECLIA 2.80 48/17 HR 1.97 0.91 4.27
Nisman 2008 Israel Asian No PB/Mix IIIA–IV P 60 NA OS ELISA 3.20 43/37 RR 0.50 0.30 0.90
Hisashi 2007 Japan Asian Yes NA I–IV R 101 73 OS CLEIA 3.50 6/95 RR 9.79 2.24 42.80
Matsuoka 2007 Japan Asian Yes NA I R 256 35.5(3.7–75.5) OS ELISA 2.80 35/221 SC 2.92 2.25 6.84
Mizuguchi 2007 Japan Asian Yes NA I–IV R 272 NA OS CLEIA 2.00 149/123 HR 2.42 1.99 2.86
Barle'si 2005 France Caucasion NA TKI/NA IIIB/IV P 51 NA OS ELISA 3.50 13/38 HR 2.45 1.13 5.29
Muley 2004 Germany Caucasion Yes NA I R 153 NA OS ELISA 3.30 NA HR 2.16 1.08 4.29
Barlesi 2004 France Caucasion No PB/M IIIB/IV P 264 9(1–77) OS ELISA 3.50 138/126 HR 1.30 1.06 1.78
Trapé 2003 Spain Caucasion No PB/NA IIIA–IV P 48 NA OS ECLIA 3.60 NA HR 1.75 0.93 3.65
Kulpa 2002 Poland Caucasion NA NA I–IV NA 200 NA OS ECLIA 3.60 127/73 HR 1.31 0.92 1.87
Reinmuth 2002 Germany Caucasion Yes NA I–IIIA P 66 42(NA-86) OS ELISA 3.57 23/43 SC 2.80 0.98 7.99
Ono 2013 Japan Asian No NA IIIB/IV R 284 NA OS CLEIA 2.20 134/150 HR 0.43 0.31 0.59
Ondrej F 2014 Czech Caucasion NA TKI/M IIIB/IV R 144 NA OS/PFS ELISA 2.50 83/61 HR 2.17 1.48 3.19
Monik 2014 NA Gaussian Yes None I–IV P 50 72.5(4–108) OS ELISA 2.10 0.45 SC 1.00 0.45 2.21

HR-E: HR Estimate; R: retrospective; P: prospective; NA: not available; PB/A: Platinum-based/adjuvant chemotherapy; PB/M: Platinum-based/metastatic chemotherapy; PB/mix: Platinum-based/adjuvant chemotherapy and metastatic chemotherapy; TKI/M: TKI/metastatic chemotherapy; TKI/Mix: TKI/adjuvant and metastatic chemotherapy; SC: survival curve; AHR: adjusted hazard ratio; ALL: adjusted lower limit; AUL: adjusted upper limit; ECLIA: electrochemiluminescence immunoassay; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; CLEIA: chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay; IRMA: immunoradiometric assay.