Table 1. Analysis of violin sounds and the membrane potential of squid giant axon. The number of wins between each pair of the five prediction methods is shown. The each number indicates the number of experts in each case.

Method	Method of Comparison
#	100 (Violin sounds)					1000 (Violin sounds)
	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average
TEA	—	1000	509	175	1000	—	1000	785	201	1000
CZ	0	—	0	0	1000	0	—	21	0	1000
Exist	491	1000	—	19	1000	215	979	—	79	1000
Persistence	825	1000	981	—	1000	799	1000	921	—	1000
Average	0	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	—
#	30000 (Violin sounds)					55000 (Violin sounds)
	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average
TEA	—	1000	1000	475	1000	—	1000	998	982	1000
CZ	0	—	0	0	1000	0	—	0	0	1000
Exist	0	1000	—	0	1000	2	1000	—	2	1000
Persistence	525	1000	1000	—	1000	18	1000	998	—	1000
Average	0	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	—
#	30 (Squid axon)					90 (Squid axon)
	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average
TEA	—	17	50	120	88	—	80	115	120	120
CZ	103	—	120	120	115	40	—	103	120	120
Exist	70	0	—	120	2	5	17	—	120	59
Persistence	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	—	0
Average	32	5	118	120	—	0	0	61	120	—
#	120 (Squid axon)					180 (Squid axon)
	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average	TEA	CZ	Exist	Persistence	Average
TEA	—	109	120	120	120	—	120	120	120	120
CZ	11	—	105	120	120	0	—	113	120	120
Exist	0	15	—	120	89	0	7	—	120	117
Persistence	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	—	0
Average	0	0	31	120	—	0	0	3	120	—