Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 25;25(4):397–403. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.190

Table 5. Parenting style (assessed with the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire).

  Low risk mean (SD) Increased risk mean (SD) Difference 95% CI P-value
Parental involvement 39.6 (3.6) 40.8 (3.7) 1.2 −0.2, 2.6 0.103
Positive parenting techniquesa 24.6 (1.1) 25.1 (1.1) 1.02 0.97, 1.06 0.433
Poor parental monitoring/supervisiona 13.4 (1.3) 13.2 (1.2) 0.98 0.89, 1.08 0.660
Inconsistency in discipline 12.9 (3.6) 12.8 (2.6) −0.1 −1.4, 1.2 0.892
Corporal punishmenta 5.7 (1.2) 5.6 (1.2) 1.00 0.92, 1.08 0.971
Total scorea 96.7 (1.1) 97.9 (1.1) 1.01 0.98, 1.04 0.387

Results from linear mixed models adjusting for child age and sex.

a

Presented as geometric means and geometric standard deviations and analysed following a log-transformation so difference is ratio of geometric means rather than differences of arithmetic means.